Define __start/__stop symbols when there is only a dynamic def
H.J. Lu
hjl.tools@gmail.com
Sat Jan 27 17:44:00 GMT 2018
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Sat Jan 27 17:44:00 GMT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): Define __start/__stop symbols when there is only a dynamic def
- Next message (by thread): Define __start/__stop symbols when there is only a dynamic def
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 7:29 PM, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 10:02:38AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote: >> I don't quite understand what issues Alan's patch is trying to fix. >> Alan, do you have a testcase to show that it fails without your >> change? > > See the thread starting with > https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-01/msg00265.html Michael opened PR ld/21964: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2017-08/msg00195.html which is exactly the same issue. PR ld/21964 is fixed with testcases. Apparently, PR ld/21964 testcases in binutils source tree don't cover his use case since he still has problems. I'd like to know what use cases which PR ld/21964 testcases don't cover. -- H.J.
- Previous message (by thread): Define __start/__stop symbols when there is only a dynamic def
- Next message (by thread): Define __start/__stop symbols when there is only a dynamic def
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list