Define __start/__stop symbols when there is only a dynamic def
H.J. Lu
hjl.tools@gmail.com
Wed Jan 31 13:41:00 GMT 2018
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Wed Jan 31 13:41:00 GMT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): Define __start/__stop symbols when there is only a dynamic def
- Next message (by thread): Define __start/__stop symbols when there is only a dynamic def
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 5:02 AM, Michael Matz <matz@suse.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 31 Jan 2018, Alan Modra wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 07:56:59PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote: >> > I think we should check ref_dynamic, not def_dynamic, for __start/__stiop >> > symbols. >> >> Yes, I've thought about it a bit more and I think that would be >> better. > > Only checking ref_dynamic would mean that my testcase doesn't work > anymore. I.e. the pacemaker situation wouldn't be improved and we could > have spared the whole merry-go-round. Are you really sure that your testcase: https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-01/msg00432.html doesn't have a reference from shared object? -- H.J.
- Previous message (by thread): Define __start/__stop symbols when there is only a dynamic def
- Next message (by thread): Define __start/__stop symbols when there is only a dynamic def
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list