New ARM testsuite failures
Nick Clifton
nickc@redhat.com
Thu Nov 29 12:26:00 GMT 2018
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Thu Nov 29 12:26:00 GMT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): New ARM testsuite failures
- Next message (by thread): New ARM testsuite failures
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Andre, >> No good deed goes unpunished ;) So true. So true. :-) > This left me stuck though because: > 1) I don't understand why it matters if a target is ELF or not when > making this transformation, I heard it might be because of some non-elf > targets having to perform state changes in a slightly different manner? I think that it is because with non-ELF targets you cannot tell if a label is a function entry point or some other kind of branch destination. > 2) Should arm-netbsdelf and/or arm-nto be 'elf'? Specially the first > lead me to think yes, as for the second I have no idea. Yes and yes. (NTO is a form of ELF format used by QNX RTOS). [Aargh acronym overload!] Cheers Nick
- Previous message (by thread): New ARM testsuite failures
- Next message (by thread): New ARM testsuite failures
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list