PR23425, unresolved symbol diagnostic
Tom Tromey
tom@tromey.com
Tue Sep 11 16:04:00 GMT 2018
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Sep 11 16:04:00 GMT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): PR23425, unresolved symbol diagnostic
- Next message (by thread): PR23425, unresolved symbol diagnostic
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>>>> "Alan" == Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> writes: Alan> I think this should be OK for all the gdb uses of Alan> bfd_simple_get_relocated_section_contents or similar code in Alan> compile-object-load.c, but I won't commit this immediately to give gdb Alan> folk time to comment. There should be gdb test cases covering the relocation cases. For the compile feature you'll need to make sure your gcc is compile-capable and that the needed library and plugin are installed. However, I believe relocation isn't only used for the compile feature. There's this in dwarf2read.c: /* When debugging .o files, we may need to apply relocations; see http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2002-04/msg00136.html . We never compress sections in .o files, so we only need to try this when the section is not compressed. */ retbuf = symfile_relocate_debug_section (objfile, sectp, buf); I don't know if there is a test case for this or not -- I'd hope so. Tom
- Previous message (by thread): PR23425, unresolved symbol diagnostic
- Next message (by thread): PR23425, unresolved symbol diagnostic
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list