Home Original page

[PATCH v2 5/9] x86: improve handling of insns with ambiguous operand sizes

H.J. Lu hjl.tools@gmail.com
Thu Nov 14 19:19:00 GMT 2019 
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 1:00 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On 13.11.2019 22:12,  H.J. Lu  wrote:
> > What do you mean by improving AT&T syntax?  AT&T syntax has
> > many quirks.  We should leave them alone if we can.
>
> May I kindly ask you to read the description of this patch again.
> Current AT&T behavior is, as far as I'm concerned, intolerably
> dangerous (and in the course of putting together this change
> over the last couple of years it has helped point out actual
> mistakes in other projects that I've been building with early
> versions of this change in place).
>

The default size is one of quirks.  Changing it can make previously
working assembly codes stop working.  If one is writing the new
assembly codes in AT&T syntax, she/he should avoid default size
when in doubt.   We can add a command-line switch to check these
quirks.

-- 
H.J.
More information about the Binutils mailing list