[MIPS] Can we have R_MIPS_PC64?
Andrew Pinski
pinskia@gmail.com
Wed Feb 5 09:04:00 GMT 2020
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Wed Feb 5 09:04:00 GMT 2020
- Previous message (by thread): [MIPS] Can we have R_MIPS_PC64?
- Next message (by thread): [MIPS] Can we have R_MIPS_PC64?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 12:59 AM Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 11:20 PM Fangrui Song <i@maskray.me> wrote: > > > > R_MIPS_PC32 exists as a GNU extension. > > R_MIPS_PC64 existed, but was removed by https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=4030e8f62467c29b782aa2480e1e452b8e458699 > > (like all the old commits, the description just recorded what the commit *did*. There was no *why*.) > > But the why is recorded still in the mail archives: > https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2004-04/msg00657.html See the GCC side of the reason: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-04/msg01093.html Thanks, Andrew Pinski > > Thanks, > Andrew Pinski > > > > > > This just makes certain things unnecessarily complex. > > > > * DW_EH_PE_pcrel|DW_EH_PE_sdata8 => ? > > * __patchable_function_entries has to have the SHF_WRITE flag on MIPS https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2020-01/msg00106.html > > .quad foo - . => Error: PC-relative reference to a different section
- Previous message (by thread): [MIPS] Can we have R_MIPS_PC64?
- Next message (by thread): [MIPS] Can we have R_MIPS_PC64?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list