pdp11 gas/testsuite FAILs: *ABS* vs. .text
Stephen Casner
casner@acm.org
Thu Sep 3 20:44:15 GMT 2020
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Thu Sep 3 20:44:15 GMT 2020
- Previous message (by thread): pdp11 gas/testsuite FAILs: *ABS* vs. .text
- Next message (by thread): pdp11 gas/testsuite FAILs: *ABS* vs. .text
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 3 Sep 2020, Paul Koning wrote: > > On Sep 3, 2020, at 3:05 AM, Stephen Casner <casner@acm.org> wrote: > > > > There are two new FAILs for pdp11 gas testsuite since I last ran it > > before the 2.35 release. In both tests, objdump is showing the > > section for a reference to location 00000000 of the .text section as > > .text whereas the test script is expecting *ABS*. However, .text > > seems reasonable to me, so the scripts may just be wrong. These are: > > > > gas/testsuite/gas/pdp11/opcode.[sd] > > gas/testsuite/gas/pdp11/absreloc.[sd] > > > > The lines in question are unchanged since they were originally > > committed by Alan Modra and Paul Koning, respectively, so I defer to > > you guys. > > That seems reasonable. Neither file has a section declaration in > it. Did the default section change from abs to text? If there was a default section change, it didn't make NEWS, nor could I find anything in ChangeLog. I did not find a specification of a default section in the doc, either; the closest hint was in the description of .ltorg: "This directive causes the current contents of the literal pool to be dumped into the current section (which is assumed to be the .text section)". The notion of a default section may depend upon the object format. Is there a directive to set the current section to *ABS*? -- Steve
- Previous message (by thread): pdp11 gas/testsuite FAILs: *ABS* vs. .text
- Next message (by thread): pdp11 gas/testsuite FAILs: *ABS* vs. .text
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list