Home Original page

[PATCH 1/2] bfd: move header updates up a directory

Mike Frysinger vapier@gentoo.org
Sat Dec 4 03:11:51 GMT 2021 
On 03 Dec 2021 11:27, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Mike" == Mike Frysinger via Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org> writes:
> 
> Mike> The rules for rebuilding the bfd headers live in the doc/ subdir
> Mike> (most likely) because they rely on the chew & related tools.
> 
> I brought this up once before, but didn't get an answer, so I thought
> I'd mention it again.
> 
> What if we got rid of chew?  The docs that it creates aren't really all
> that usable, and the approach taken by it means that the canonical
> definition of some types is in a comment, not normal code.

i don't have a vested interest in bfd, but i was looking at this with the
sim and was planning on pulling all the docs out of the source and into
the texi files directly.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20211203/a7088fe1/attachment.sig>
More information about the Binutils mailing list