bfd/docs building on Cygwin
Alan Modra
amodra@gmail.com
Tue Feb 9 11:37:39 GMT 2021
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Feb 9 11:37:39 GMT 2021
- Previous message (by thread): bfd/docs building on Cygwin
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] opcodes: tic54x: namespace exported variables
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 10:21:42AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 09.02.2021 01:11, Alan Modra wrote: > > I don't see a problem in requiring GNU make to build binutils, but > > that should be formalised by saying so in binutils/README. > > Oh, I realize right now GNU make is documented as a requirement > only when wanting to build in a directory distinct from the > source one. Perhaps requiring GNU make uniformly is too > aggressive then? Plus I supposed gdb folks would need to agree > too, as bfd/ is shared between the two? They already require GNU make. From gdb/NEWS * Building GDB and GDBserver now requires GNU make >= 3.82. So does gcc. @item GNU make version 3.80 (or later) You must have GNU make installed to build GCC@. -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM
- Previous message (by thread): bfd/docs building on Cygwin
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] opcodes: tic54x: namespace exported variables
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list