[PATCH] x86-64: Allocate input section memory if needed
H.J. Lu
hjl.tools@gmail.com
Wed Dec 28 17:23:21 GMT 2022
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Wed Dec 28 17:23:21 GMT 2022
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] x86-64: Allocate input section memory if needed
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] x86-64: Allocate input section memory if needed
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 5:16 PM Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 11:47:56AM -0800, H.J. Lu via Binutils wrote: > > + /* Cache the section contents for > > + elf_link_input_bfd. */ > > + elf_section_data (sec)->this_hdr.contents > > + = contents; > > You shouldn't really be caching unaltered section contents when > !info->keep_memory. I'm not saying the patch is wrong, but please fix > this when you have some time. > > -- > Alan Modra > Australia Development Lab, IBM elf_x86_64_scan_relocs has if (elf_section_data (sec)->this_hdr.contents != contents) { if (!converted && !_bfd_link_keep_memory (info)) free (contents); else { /* Cache the section contents for elf_link_input_bfd if any load is converted or --no-keep-memory isn't used. */ elf_section_data (sec)->this_hdr.contents = contents; info->cache_size += sec->size; } } Are you suggesting that it should be if (elf_section_data (sec)->this_hdr.contents != contents) { if (!converted) free (contents); else { /* Cache the section contents for elf_link_input_bfd if any load is converted. */ elf_section_data (sec)->this_hdr.contents = contents; info->cache_size += sec->size; } } Thanks. -- H.J.
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] x86-64: Allocate input section memory if needed
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] x86-64: Allocate input section memory if needed
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list