[PATCH v4 0/4] RISC-V: Combined floating point enhancements
Tsukasa OI
research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com
Sun Jul 24 18:58:54 GMT 2022
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Sun Jul 24 18:58:54 GMT 2022
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH v3 4/4] RISC-V: Add testcases for Z[dq]inx register pairs
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH v4 1/4] RISC-V: Reorganize and enhance Zfinx tests
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Before combining patchsets: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-May/120935.html> (Zfh/Zfhmin v2) <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-May/120940.html> (Zfinx v2) Combined v1: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-June/121138.html> Combined v2: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-June/121441.html> Combined v3: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-July/121720.html> Tracker on GitHub: <https://github.com/a4lg/binutils-gdb/wiki/riscv_float_combined> This is a rebased and fixed version for Zfinx-related issues. First, let me recap the changes. 1. Enhance Zfinx/Zdinx/Zqinx Testcases (PATCH 1/4) I enhanced Zfinx/Zdinx/Zqinx testcases based on Jiawei's Zhinx support patch. I also... - Made indentation / coding style consistent and clean - Started to use valid register number on Zqinx (as I explain below [PATCH 3-4/4]) - Started to use different register per operand 2. Relax Requirements to fmv.[sdq] instructions (PATCH 2/4) On Zfinx/Zdinx/Zqinx, fmv instructions seem redundant but actually not. On RV32_Z[dq]inx and RV64_Zqinx, it requires register pair. That means, single... fmv.d x10, x12 is equivalent to 2 regular instructions on RV32_Zdinx (with 32-bit GPRs): mv x10, x12 mv x11, x13 Since fsgnj.[sdq] (base instruction of fmv.[sdq]) are a part of Z[fdq]inx extensions, it's safe to implement this pseudo-instructions. This patch makes fmv.[sdq] available to Zfinx/Zdinx/Zqinx environments. 3. Validate Register pairs on Zdinx/Zqinx (PATCH 3-4/4) On RV32_Zdinx and RV64_Zqinx, all registers holding a FP64 value must be even (x0, x2, x4... are valid, x1, x3, x5... are invalid). On RV32_Zqinx, it would be that all registers holding a FP128 value will be required to have a multiple of 4 (x0, x4, x8... are valid, x1, x2, x3, x5... are not). On RV32_Zdinx, this is valid. fadd.d x10, x12, x14 On the other hand, this is not valid (on RV32_Zdinx). fadd.d x11, x13, x15 Current Binutils can generate invalid instructions with odd register numbers (or register number x % 4 != 0). PATCH 3/4 makes those invalid. Testcases (PATCH 4/4) are separate only because it is quite large. [Changes: v3 -> v4] - Rebased - Fixed `fcvt.q.l{,u}' testcases (we don't need rounding anymore) Clearly, I forgot to test the patchset. This time, I confirmed that it passes the test. [Changes: v2 -> v3] - Rebased - Postponed non-functional (coding style-related) changes for another patchset - Started to use `.insn r OP_FP, ...' on Z[dq]inx disassembler tests - Fixed `fcvt.q.l{,u}' instruction match values Tsukasa OI (4): RISC-V: Reorganize and enhance Zfinx tests RISC-V: Relax `fmv.[sdq]' requirements RISC-V: Validate Zdinx/Zqinx register pairs RISC-V: Add testcases for Z[dq]inx register pairs bfd/elfxx-riscv.c | 8 + gas/config/tc-riscv.c | 21 +- .../gas/riscv/zdinx-32-regpair-dis.d | 11 + .../gas/riscv/zdinx-32-regpair-dis.s | 5 + .../gas/riscv/zdinx-32-regpair-fail.d | 3 + .../gas/riscv/zdinx-32-regpair-fail.l | 111 ++++ .../gas/riscv/zdinx-32-regpair-fail.s | 116 ++++ gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zdinx-32-regpair.d | 65 +++ gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zdinx-32-regpair.s | 62 ++ gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zdinx.d | 27 +- gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zdinx.s | 46 +- gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zfinx.d | 24 +- gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zfinx.s | 42 +- .../gas/riscv/zqinx-32-regpair-dis.d | 12 + .../gas/riscv/zqinx-32-regpair-dis.s | 7 + .../gas/riscv/zqinx-32-regpair-fail.d | 3 + .../gas/riscv/zqinx-32-regpair-fail.l | 212 +++++++ .../gas/riscv/zqinx-32-regpair-fail.s | 218 +++++++ gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zqinx-32-regpair.d | 66 +++ gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zqinx-32-regpair.s | 64 +++ .../gas/riscv/zqinx-64-regpair-dis.d | 11 + .../gas/riscv/zqinx-64-regpair-dis.s | 5 + .../gas/riscv/zqinx-64-regpair-fail.d | 3 + .../gas/riscv/zqinx-64-regpair-fail.l | 133 +++++ .../gas/riscv/zqinx-64-regpair-fail.s | 138 +++++ gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zqinx-64-regpair.d | 87 +++ gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zqinx-64-regpair.s | 84 +++ gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zqinx.d | 84 +-- gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zqinx.s | 87 +-- include/opcode/riscv.h | 10 +- opcodes/riscv-opc.c | 541 ++++++++++++++---- 31 files changed, 2097 insertions(+), 209 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zdinx-32-regpair-dis.d create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zdinx-32-regpair-dis.s create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zdinx-32-regpair-fail.d create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zdinx-32-regpair-fail.l create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zdinx-32-regpair-fail.s create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zdinx-32-regpair.d create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zdinx-32-regpair.s create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zqinx-32-regpair-dis.d create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zqinx-32-regpair-dis.s create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zqinx-32-regpair-fail.d create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zqinx-32-regpair-fail.l create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zqinx-32-regpair-fail.s create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zqinx-32-regpair.d create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zqinx-32-regpair.s create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zqinx-64-regpair-dis.d create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zqinx-64-regpair-dis.s create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zqinx-64-regpair-fail.d create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zqinx-64-regpair-fail.l create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zqinx-64-regpair-fail.s create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zqinx-64-regpair.d create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zqinx-64-regpair.s base-commit: ea892bdc4b6da5782c6ea6273aff499fb5fd5e6f -- 2.34.1
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH v3 4/4] RISC-V: Add testcases for Z[dq]inx register pairs
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH v4 1/4] RISC-V: Reorganize and enhance Zfinx tests
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list