buildbot users try branch builders
Mark Wielaard
mark@klomp.org
Wed Jun 22 10:51:31 GMT 2022
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Wed Jun 22 10:51:31 GMT 2022
- Previous message (by thread): buildbot users try branch builders
- Next message (by thread): buildbot users try branch builders
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Jan, On Wed, 2022-06-22 at 08:32 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > I'm not very fluent in git, yet before that might happen I'd like to > figure a way to keep my clone clean of the objects related to such > branches, but without also omitting the objects for, in particular, > release branches. Hence in .git/config > > fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* > > is too wide while limiting to just master is too narrow. From earlier > experiments I seem to recall that the *s here can't be simply > replaced by more restricting wildcard "expressions" ... Note that you can have multiple fetch lines, so you can just add a list of explicit refs you want to fetch. But I do see your problem, unlike in gcc where the releases are all under refs/heads/releases/ the binutils and gdb ones are directly under /heads/. Maybe the negative refspecs that Andreas mentioned would help here because all user branches are under /ref/heads/users/ So maybe adding fetch = ^refs/heads/users/* would do the trick? (untested) Cheers, Mark
- Previous message (by thread): buildbot users try branch builders
- Next message (by thread): buildbot users try branch builders
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list