[PATCH 0/6] x86: drop L1OM/K1OM from gas plus associated tidying

H.J. Lu hjl.tools@gmail.com
Wed Mar 16 17:11:27 GMT 2022
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:42 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>
> It was the bugs / shortcomings dealt with here as a "side effect"
> which made me raise the question of the utility of having the
> rudimentary support for the two sub-architectures. Oddly enough
> some of the bugs need fixing _before_ removing the support, or else
> IAMCU would regress. Furthermore a new IAMCU test can be put in
> place only _after_ removing the support.
>
> 1: assorted IAMCU CPU checking fixes
> 2: drop L1OM/K1OM support from gas
> 3: add another IAMCU testcase
> 4: unify CPU flag on/off processing
> 5: never set i386_cpu_flags' "unused" field
> 6: don't accept base architectures as extensions
>

OK to all.

Can you also remove L1OM/K1OM from ld and binutils?

Thanks.

--
H.J.


More information about the Binutils mailing list