[PATCHv2 3/3] opcodes/i386: partially implement disassembler style support
Andrew Burgess
aburgess@redhat.com
Mon Mar 21 14:33:52 GMT 2022
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Mon Mar 21 14:33:52 GMT 2022
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCHv2 2/3] opcodes/riscv: implement style support in the disassembler
- Next message (by thread): [PATCHv2 0/3] disassembler syntax highlighting in objdump (via libopcodes)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This commit adds partial support for disassembler styling in the i386
disassembler.
The i386 disassembler collects the instruction arguments into an array
of strings, and then loops over the array printing the arguments out
later on. The problem is that by the time we print the arguments out
it's not obvious what the type of each argument is.
Obviously this can be fixed, but I'd like to not do that as part of
this commit, rather, I'd prefer to keep this commit as small as
possible to get the basic infrastructure in place, then we can improve
on this, to add additional styling, in later commits.
For now then, I think this commit should correctly style mnemonics,
some immediates, and comments. Everything else will be printed as
plain text, which will include most instruction arguments, unless the
argument is printed as a symbol, by calling the print_address_func
callback.
Ignoring colours, there should be no other user visible changes in the
output of the disassembler in either objdump or gdb.
opcodes/ChangeLog:
* disassembler.c (disassemble_init_for_target): Set
created_styled_output for i386 based targets.
* i386-dis.c: Changed throughout to use fprintf_styled_func
instead of fprintf_func.
---
opcodes/disassemble.c | 9 ++++++-
opcodes/i386-dis.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/opcodes/disassemble.c b/opcodes/disassemble.c
index b8eed9695ea..81a90f20a9c 100644
--- a/opcodes/disassemble.c
+++ b/opcodes/disassemble.c
@@ -632,7 +632,14 @@ disassemble_init_for_target (struct disassemble_info * info)
info->disassembler_needs_relocs = true;
break;
#endif
-
+#ifdef ARCH_i386
+ case bfd_arch_i386:
+ case bfd_arch_iamcu:
+ case bfd_arch_l1om:
+ case bfd_arch_k1om:
+ info->created_styled_output = true;
+ break;
+#endif
#ifdef ARCH_ia64
case bfd_arch_ia64:
info->skip_zeroes = 16;
diff --git a/opcodes/i386-dis.c b/opcodes/i386-dis.c
index a30bda0633b..d12ef4514fd 100644
--- a/opcodes/i386-dis.c
+++ b/opcodes/i386-dis.c
@@ -9402,8 +9402,8 @@ print_insn (bfd_vma pc, instr_info *ins)
if (ins->address_mode == mode_64bit && sizeof (bfd_vma) < 8)
{
- (*ins->info->fprintf_func) (ins->info->stream,
- _("64-bit address is disabled"));
+ (*ins->info->fprintf_styled_func) (ins->info->stream, dis_style_text,
+ _("64-bit address is disabled"));
return -1;
}
@@ -9456,12 +9456,16 @@ print_insn (bfd_vma pc, instr_info *ins)
{
name = prefix_name (ins, priv.the_buffer[0], priv.orig_sizeflag);
if (name != NULL)
- (*ins->info->fprintf_func) (ins->info->stream, "%s", name);
+ (*ins->info->fprintf_styled_func)
+ (ins->info->stream, dis_style_mnemonic, "%s", name);
else
{
/* Just print the first byte as a .byte instruction. */
- (*ins->info->fprintf_func) (ins->info->stream, ".byte 0x%x",
- (unsigned int) priv.the_buffer[0]);
+ (*ins->info->fprintf_styled_func)
+ (ins->info->stream, dis_style_assembler_directive, ".byte ");
+ (*ins->info->fprintf_styled_func)
+ (ins->info->stream, dis_style_immediate, "0x%x",
+ (unsigned int) priv.the_buffer[0]);
}
return 1;
@@ -9479,10 +9483,10 @@ print_insn (bfd_vma pc, instr_info *ins)
for (i = 0;
i < (int) ARRAY_SIZE (ins->all_prefixes) && ins->all_prefixes[i];
i++)
- (*ins->info->fprintf_func) (ins->info->stream, "%s%s",
- i == 0 ? "" : " ",
- prefix_name (ins, ins->all_prefixes[i],
- sizeflag));
+ (*ins->info->fprintf_styled_func)
+ (ins->info->stream, dis_style_mnemonic, "%s%s",
+ (i == 0 ? "" : " "), prefix_name (ins, ins->all_prefixes[i],
+ sizeflag));
return i;
}
@@ -9497,10 +9501,11 @@ print_insn (bfd_vma pc, instr_info *ins)
/* Handle ins->prefixes before fwait. */
for (i = 0; i < ins->fwait_prefix && ins->all_prefixes[i];
i++)
- (*ins->info->fprintf_func) (ins->info->stream, "%s ",
- prefix_name (ins, ins->all_prefixes[i],
- sizeflag));
- (*ins->info->fprintf_func) (ins->info->stream, "fwait");
+ (*ins->info->fprintf_styled_func)
+ (ins->info->stream, dis_style_mnemonic, "%s ",
+ prefix_name (ins, ins->all_prefixes[i], sizeflag));
+ (*ins->info->fprintf_styled_func)
+ (ins->info->stream, dis_style_mnemonic, "fwait");
return i + 1;
}
@@ -9649,14 +9654,16 @@ print_insn (bfd_vma pc, instr_info *ins)
are all 0s in inverted form. */
if (ins->need_vex && ins->vex.register_specifier != 0)
{
- (*ins->info->fprintf_func) (ins->info->stream, "(bad)");
+ (*ins->info->fprintf_styled_func) (ins->info->stream, dis_style_text,
+ "(bad)");
return ins->end_codep - priv.the_buffer;
}
/* If EVEX.z is set, there must be an actual mask register in use. */
if (ins->vex.zeroing && ins->vex.mask_register_specifier == 0)
{
- (*ins->info->fprintf_func) (ins->info->stream, "(bad)");
+ (*ins->info->fprintf_styled_func) (ins->info->stream, dis_style_text,
+ "(bad)");
return ins->end_codep - priv.the_buffer;
}
@@ -9667,7 +9674,8 @@ print_insn (bfd_vma pc, instr_info *ins)
the encoding invalid. Most other PREFIX_OPCODE rules still apply. */
if (ins->need_vex ? !ins->vex.prefix : !(ins->prefixes & PREFIX_DATA))
{
- (*ins->info->fprintf_func) (ins->info->stream, "(bad)");
+ (*ins->info->fprintf_styled_func) (ins->info->stream,
+ dis_style_text, "(bad)");
return ins->end_codep - priv.the_buffer;
}
ins->used_prefixes |= PREFIX_DATA;
@@ -9694,7 +9702,8 @@ print_insn (bfd_vma pc, instr_info *ins)
|| (ins->vex.evex && dp->prefix_requirement != PREFIX_DATA
&& !ins->vex.w != !(ins->used_prefixes & PREFIX_DATA)))
{
- (*ins->info->fprintf_func) (ins->info->stream, "(bad)");
+ (*ins->info->fprintf_styled_func) (ins->info->stream,
+ dis_style_text, "(bad)");
return ins->end_codep - priv.the_buffer;
}
break;
@@ -9744,13 +9753,15 @@ print_insn (bfd_vma pc, instr_info *ins)
if (name == NULL)
abort ();
prefix_length += strlen (name) + 1;
- (*ins->info->fprintf_func) (ins->info->stream, "%s ", name);
+ (*ins->info->fprintf_styled_func)
+ (ins->info->stream, dis_style_mnemonic, "%s ", name);
}
/* Check maximum code length. */
if ((ins->codep - ins->start_codep) > MAX_CODE_LENGTH)
{
- (*ins->info->fprintf_func) (ins->info->stream, "(bad)");
+ (*ins->info->fprintf_styled_func)
+ (ins->info->stream, dis_style_text, "(bad)");
return MAX_CODE_LENGTH;
}
@@ -9758,7 +9769,8 @@ print_insn (bfd_vma pc, instr_info *ins)
for (i = strlen (ins->obuf) + prefix_length; i < 6; i++)
oappend (ins, " ");
oappend (ins, " ");
- (*ins->info->fprintf_func) (ins->info->stream, "%s", ins->obuf);
+ (*ins->info->fprintf_styled_func)
+ (ins->info->stream, dis_style_mnemonic, "%s", ins->obuf);
/* The enter and bound instructions are printed with operands in the same
order as the intel book; everything else is printed in reverse order. */
@@ -9797,7 +9809,8 @@ print_insn (bfd_vma pc, instr_info *ins)
if (*op_txt[i])
{
if (needcomma)
- (*ins->info->fprintf_func) (ins->info->stream, ",");
+ (*ins->info->fprintf_styled_func) (ins->info->stream,
+ dis_style_text, ",");
if (ins->op_index[i] != -1 && !ins->op_riprel[i])
{
bfd_vma target = (bfd_vma) ins->op_address[ins->op_index[i]];
@@ -9813,14 +9826,18 @@ print_insn (bfd_vma pc, instr_info *ins)
(*ins->info->print_address_func) (target, ins->info);
}
else
- (*ins->info->fprintf_func) (ins->info->stream, "%s", op_txt[i]);
+ (*ins->info->fprintf_styled_func) (ins->info->stream,
+ dis_style_text, "%s",
+ op_txt[i]);
needcomma = 1;
}
for (i = 0; i < MAX_OPERANDS; i++)
if (ins->op_index[i] != -1 && ins->op_riprel[i])
{
- (*ins->info->fprintf_func) (ins->info->stream, " # ");
+ (*ins->info->fprintf_styled_func) (ins->info->stream,
+ dis_style_comment_start,
+ " # ");
(*ins->info->print_address_func) ((bfd_vma)
(ins->start_pc + (ins->codep - ins->start_codep)
+ ins->op_address[ins->op_index[i]]), ins->info);
--
2.25.4
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCHv2 2/3] opcodes/riscv: implement style support in the disassembler
- Next message (by thread): [PATCHv2 0/3] disassembler syntax highlighting in objdump (via libopcodes)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list