[PATCH 2/2] bfd: Remove bfd_arch_l1om and bfd_arch_k1om
H.J. Lu
hjl.tools@gmail.com
Fri Mar 25 14:22:29 GMT 2022
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Mar 25 14:22:29 GMT 2022
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH 2/2] bfd: Remove bfd_arch_l1om and bfd_arch_k1om
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH 2/2] bfd: Remove bfd_arch_l1om and bfd_arch_k1om
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 1:21 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote: > > On 24.03.2022 20:23, H.J. Lu wrote: > > Remove bfd_arch_l1om and bfd_arch_k1om since L1OM/K1OM support has been > > removed from gas, ld and opcodes. > > As said in a post-commit-message comment of the patch removing support > from ld/, I'd prefer to keep e.g. elfedit functioning for these targets. elfedit doesn't need bfd_arch_l1om nor bfd_arch_k1om. > Maybe not necessarily for the input, but at least for the output. Else > there's no way for people to create such objects anymore, forcing them > to resort to hex-editing of files, which I view as undesirable. I think > this 2nd patch goes against that; I'm not sure in how far the 1st one > would still allow this to function. People can use the older binutils. -- H.J.
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH 2/2] bfd: Remove bfd_arch_l1om and bfd_arch_k1om
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH 2/2] bfd: Remove bfd_arch_l1om and bfd_arch_k1om
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list