[PATCH] x86: fold AVX512-VNNI disassembler entries with AVX-VNNI ones
Jan Beulich
jbeulich@suse.com
Mon Oct 17 06:39:17 GMT 2022
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Mon Oct 17 06:39:17 GMT 2022
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] x86: fold AVX512-VNNI disassembler entries with AVX-VNNI ones
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] x86: fold AVX512-VNNI disassembler entries with AVX-VNNI ones
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 14.10.2022 19:28, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 3:22 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote: >> >> Make %XV also print the separating blank in the VEX case, while making >> it do nothing for EVEX-encoded insns. This way the AVX-VNNI entries >> can be re-used for AVX512-VNNI, at the same time fixing the lack of >> EVEX.W decoding. >> >> For the AVX-VNNI ones further make sure only VEX.66 forms are actually >> decoded. >> --- >> Irrespective of this change I continue to disagree with the arbitrary >> printing of "{vex}" for the AVX-VNNI insns: If that's meant for >> disambiguation purposes, then EVEX-encoded insns not using EVEX-specific >> functionality by having VEX counterparts (vaddps %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm0) >> should also be prefixed by "{evex}". > > This is done to match the assembler. There are 3 kinds of VNNI processors: > > 1. AVX512-VNNI only. > 2. AVX-VNNI only. > 3. AVX512-VNNI and AVX-VNNI. > > Since AVX512-VNNI came out first, all VNNI instructions without a prefix > are encoded as AVX512-VNNI. The existing VNNI instructions without > a prefix, generated by compiler or hand written, are encoded with EVEX. > If one needs VNNI with VEX encoding, the {vex} prefix should be used. ... if, as said, AVX512 wasn't turned off altogether. With your model, just look at how odd code using both AVX-VNNI and AVX-VNNI-INT8 then looks: vpdpbssd %ymm0, %ymm5, %ymm6 vpdpbsud %ymm1, %ymm5, %ymm6 {vex} vpdpbusd %ymm2, %ymm5, %ymm6 vpdpbuud %ymm3, %ymm5, %ymm6 Yes, one could further clutter this and add {vex} to every line. But why would anyone want to clutter their code? Plus the same argument then applies to AVX512VL: This came out later than AVX, and the assembler (necessarily) requires {evex} to actually encode these (when there are AVX equivalents). Hence to match the assembler, the disassembler then also ought to emit {evex} for this subset of encodings. Jan > This applies to any AVX extensions which come after EVEX ones, including > AVX-IFMA.
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] x86: fold AVX512-VNNI disassembler entries with AVX-VNNI ones
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] x86: fold AVX512-VNNI disassembler entries with AVX-VNNI ones
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list