[PATCH v5 0/3] RISC-V: Add 'Zmmul' extension
Tsukasa OI
research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com
Thu Sep 1 07:47:54 GMT 2022
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Thu Sep 1 07:47:54 GMT 2022
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] LoongArch: Use copy relocation for %pc_lo12 against external symbol
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] Add OpenBSD ARM Little Endian BFD support.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2022/08/30 18:55, Nelson Chu wrote: > Thanks, committed except the gdb-sim part, since I'm not the > maintainer of gdb and sim, so I cannot approve the related stuff. > Besides that, some minor failures of ld testcases which caused by m > adding implicit zmmul. However, I also fix that since it's minor. > > Nelson Thanks, and I resubmitted the sim part because it's now broken. <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-August/191609.html> Tsukasa > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 9:59 AM Tsukasa OI via Binutils > <binutils@sourceware.org> wrote: >> >> Hi RISC-V folks, >> >> 'Zmmul' is a RISC-V extension consisting of only multiply instructions (a >> subset of 'M'; multiply and divide instructions). >> >> This patch is PATCH v5 of the Zmmul support patchset primarily for Binutils >> but also contains some GDB changes (a simulator fix and a new testcase). >> >> I completed the copyright assignment for my GDB contribution so minor >> simulator changes are now safe enough to merge. >> >> Changed Project(s): >> PATCH 1/3: Binutils >> PATCH 2/3: Binutils and GDB (not to make "temporally broken" revision) >> PATCH 3/3: Binutils >> >> >> Note: >> To confirm that the simulator is fixed, it requires another patch. >> <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-August/191564.html> >> Without the patch above, 'Zmmul' extension will still work perfectly >> (even the simulator). Still, testing whether the simulator works with this >> extension (with `make check-sim') requires it. >> >> >> Tracker on GitHub: >> <https://github.com/a4lg/binutils-gdb/wiki/riscv_zmmul> >> PATCH v1: >> <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-July/121685.html> >> PATCH v2: >> <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-July/121791.html> >> PATCH v3: >> <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-July/121810.html> >> PATCH v4: >> <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-August/122300.html> >> >> >> This is based on the ISA Manual, draft-20220707-f518c25: >> <https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/releases/tag/draft-20220707-f518c25> >> <https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/commit/f518c259c008f926eba4aba67804f62531b6e94b> >> >> This patchset also contains generic 'M' extension testcases as PATCH 1/3 (it >> also tests for existence of the symbol `zmmul' so that it can also be a >> base of 'Zmmul' testcases). >> >> >> [Changes: v4 -> v5] >> >> - Clarify that PATCH 1/3 (new 'M' extension testcases) contains >> preparation for the 'Zmmul' extension. >> >> >> [BUG in PATCH v2 (fixed in v3): Simulator stopped working] >> >> The cause was simple. The RISC-V simulator supports I, M and A extensions >> and the instruction is identified by those instruction classes: >> >> - INSN_CLASS_I (for 'I') >> - INSN_CLASS_M (for 'M') >> - INSN_CLASS_A (for 'A') >> >> I forgot to add INSN_CLASS_ZMMUL (also for 'M') to that list and that caused >> multiply instructions to cause failure. >> >> PATCH v3 fixed that and I added a testcase (checks whether all RV32M >> instructions run without any fault). >> >> >> Thanks, >> Tsukasa >> >> >> >> >> Tsukasa OI (3): >> RISC-V: Add 'M' extension testcases >> RISC-V: Add 'Zmmul' extension >> RISC-V: Add 'Zmmul' failure testcases >> >> bfd/elfxx-riscv.c | 6 +++++ >> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/attribute-09.d | 2 +- >> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-32.d | 18 +++++++++++++ >> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-64.d | 23 ++++++++++++++++ >> .../gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-noarch-64.d | 4 +++ >> .../gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-noarch-64.l | 14 ++++++++++ >> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-xlen-32.d | 4 +++ >> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-xlen-32.l | 6 +++++ >> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-zmmul-32.d | 4 +++ >> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-zmmul-32.l | 5 ++++ >> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-zmmul-64.d | 4 +++ >> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-zmmul-64.l | 9 +++++++ >> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext.s | 21 +++++++++++++++ >> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/option-arch-02.d | 2 +- >> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zmmul-32.d | 14 ++++++++++ >> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zmmul-64.d | 15 +++++++++++ >> include/opcode/riscv.h | 1 + >> opcodes/riscv-opc.c | 26 +++++++++---------- >> sim/riscv/sim-main.c | 1 + >> sim/testsuite/riscv/m-ext.s | 18 +++++++++++++ >> 20 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-32.d >> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-64.d >> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-noarch-64.d >> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-noarch-64.l >> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-xlen-32.d >> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-xlen-32.l >> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-zmmul-32.d >> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-zmmul-32.l >> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-zmmul-64.d >> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-zmmul-64.l >> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext.s >> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zmmul-32.d >> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zmmul-64.d >> create mode 100644 sim/testsuite/riscv/m-ext.s >> >> >> base-commit: 27d582267a1d06e94661979f8893799ac235a768 >> -- >> 2.34.1 >> >
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] LoongArch: Use copy relocation for %pc_lo12 against external symbol
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] Add OpenBSD ARM Little Endian BFD support.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list