Home Original page

[PATCH 0/3] RISC-V: alias insn adjustments

Jan Beulich jbeulich@suse.com
Tue Sep 13 16:11:50 GMT 2022 
On 13.09.2022 16:54, Tsukasa OI wrote:
> On 2022/09/13 21:59, Jan Beulich via Binutils wrote:
>> 1: re-arrange opcode table for consistent alias handling
>> 2: drop stray INSN_ALIAS flags
>> 3: add alias for SLLI.UW
>>
>> In particular the 3rd patch may want considering to be at least slightly
>> RFC.
>>
>> Jan
>>
> 
> +1 to PATCH 1-2/3 except we can just add -M no-aliases to existing tests
> zbkb-32.d and fence-tso.d just like my submission (they don't test any
> aliases):

I'd consider that wrong - disassembly should work correctly in both modes,
so both modes would better be tested. After all it was just one of the
two modes which didn't work.

One might further consider generalization, forcing most (all?) tests to be
done both ways.

> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-July/121674.html

Oh, I guess I did see this earlier patch of yours and then forgot about
its existence, re-doing the work.

Jan
More information about the Binutils mailing list