Home Original page

[PATCH V2] RISC-V Implement Ztso extension

Tsukasa OI research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com
Sat Sep 17 10:25:07 GMT 2022 
Hi Shihua,

On 2022/09/17 19:03, shihua@iscas.ac.cn wrote:
> From: Liao Shihua <shihua@iscas.ac.cn>
> 
>    This patch support ZTSO extension. It will turn on the tso flag for elf_flags once we have enabled Ztso extension.
>    This is intended to implement v0.1 of the proposed specification which can be found in Chapter 25 of https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/releases/download/draft-20220723-10eea63/riscv-spec.pdf.
> 
> bfd\ChangeLog:
> 
>         * elfnn-riscv.c (_bfd_riscv_elf_merge_private_bfd_data):Set TSO flag.
>         * elfxx-riscv.c (riscv_multi_subset_supports): Add handling for new instruction class.
> 
> binutils\ChangeLog:
> 
>         * readelf.c (get_machine_flags):Set TSO flag.
> 
> gas\ChangeLog:
> 
>         * config/tc-riscv.c (struct riscv_set_options):Set TSO flag.
>         (riscv_set_tso):Set TSO flag.
>         (riscv_set_arch):Set TSO flag.
>         * testsuite/gas/riscv/attribute-015.d: New test.
> 
> include\ChangeLog:
> 
>         * elf/riscv.h (EF_RISCV_TSO):Define TSO bit.
>         * opcode/riscv.h (enum riscv_insn_class):Add Ztso's INSN CLASS.
> 
> ---
>  bfd/elfnn-riscv.c                       |  3 +++
>  bfd/elfxx-riscv.c                       |  5 +++++
>  binutils/readelf.c                      |  3 +++
>  gas/config/tc-riscv.c                   | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/attribute-015.d |  6 ++++++
>  include/elf/riscv.h                     |  3 +++
>  include/opcode/riscv.h                  |  1 +
>  7 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/attribute-015.d
> 
> diff --git a/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c b/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c
> index 0e0a0b09e24..3d2ddf4e651 100644
> --- a/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c
> +++ b/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c
> @@ -3872,6 +3872,9 @@ _bfd_riscv_elf_merge_private_bfd_data (bfd *ibfd, struct bfd_link_info *info)
>    /* Allow linking RVC and non-RVC, and keep the RVC flag.  */
>    elf_elfheader (obfd)->e_flags |= new_flags & EF_RISCV_RVC;
>  
> +  /* Allow linking TSO and non-TSO, and keep the TSO flag.  */
> +  elf_elfheader (obfd)->e_flags |= new_flags & EF_RISCV_TSO;
> +
>    return true;
>  
>   fail:
> diff --git a/bfd/elfxx-riscv.c b/bfd/elfxx-riscv.c
> index e03b312a381..a0630d4c183 100644
> --- a/bfd/elfxx-riscv.c
> +++ b/bfd/elfxx-riscv.c
> @@ -1204,6 +1204,7 @@ static struct riscv_supported_ext riscv_supported_std_z_ext[] =
>    {"zvl16384b",		ISA_SPEC_CLASS_DRAFT,		1, 0,  0 },
>    {"zvl32768b",		ISA_SPEC_CLASS_DRAFT,		1, 0,  0 },
>    {"zvl65536b",		ISA_SPEC_CLASS_DRAFT,		1, 0,  0 },
> +  {"ztso", ISA_SPEC_CLASS_DRAFT, 0, 1, 0 },

This is okay but I feel adjusting the indent is better.

>    {NULL, 0, 0, 0, 0}
>  };
>  
> @@ -2376,6 +2377,8 @@ riscv_multi_subset_supports (riscv_parse_subset_t *rps,
>  	      || riscv_subset_supports (rps, "zve64d")
>  	      || riscv_subset_supports (rps, "zve64f")
>  	      || riscv_subset_supports (rps, "zve32f"));
> +    case INSN_CLASS_ZTSO:
> +      return riscv_subset_supports (rps, "ztso");

I don't support adding INSN_CLASS_ZTSO since Ztso has no new instructions.

>      case INSN_CLASS_SVINVAL:
>        return riscv_subset_supports (rps, "svinval");
>      case INSN_CLASS_H:
> @@ -2503,6 +2506,8 @@ riscv_multi_subset_supports_ext (riscv_parse_subset_t *rps,
>        return _("v' or `zve64x' or `zve32x");
>      case INSN_CLASS_ZVEF:
>        return _("v' or `zve64d' or `zve64f' or `zve32f");
> +    case INSN_CLASS_ZTSO:
> +      return  "ztso";

Likewise.

>      case INSN_CLASS_SVINVAL:
>        return "svinval";
>      case INSN_CLASS_H:
> diff --git a/binutils/readelf.c b/binutils/readelf.c
> index cafba9a4f56..b1dbcad06f5 100644
> --- a/binutils/readelf.c
> +++ b/binutils/readelf.c
> @@ -4079,6 +4079,9 @@ get_machine_flags (Filedata * filedata, unsigned e_flags, unsigned e_machine)
>  	  if (e_flags & EF_RISCV_RVE)
>  	    strcat (buf, ", RVE");
>  
> +	  if (e_flags & EF_RISCV_TSO)
> +	    strcat (buf, ", TSO");
> +
>  	  switch (e_flags & EF_RISCV_FLOAT_ABI)
>  	    {
>  	    case EF_RISCV_FLOAT_ABI_SOFT:
> diff --git a/gas/config/tc-riscv.c b/gas/config/tc-riscv.c
> index 2f5ee18e451..8806b455d1b 100644
> --- a/gas/config/tc-riscv.c
> +++ b/gas/config/tc-riscv.c
> @@ -234,6 +234,7 @@ struct riscv_set_options
>    int relax; /* Emit relocs the linker is allowed to relax.  */
>    int arch_attr; /* Emit architecture and privileged elf attributes.  */
>    int csr_check; /* Enable the CSR checking.  */
> +  int tso; /* Use tso model.  */
>  };
>  
>  static struct riscv_set_options riscv_opts =
> @@ -243,6 +244,7 @@ static struct riscv_set_options riscv_opts =
>    1, /* relax */
>    DEFAULT_RISCV_ATTR, /* arch_attr */
>    0, /* csr_check */
> +  0, /* tso */
>  };
>  
>  /* Enable or disable the rvc flags for riscv_opts.  Turn on the rvc flag
> @@ -257,6 +259,18 @@ riscv_set_rvc (bool rvc_value)
>    riscv_opts.rvc = rvc_value;
>  }
>  
> +/* Enable or disable the tso flags for riscv_opts.  Turn on the tso flag
> +   for elf_flags once we have enabled ztso extension.  */
> +
> +static void
> +riscv_set_tso (bool tso_value)
> +{
> +  if (tso_value)
> +    elf_flags |= EF_RISCV_TSO;

I first thought riscv_opts.tso might have a problem when .option push /
pop are used but since this is the same as RVC and setting ELF flags in
riscv_set_{tso,rvc} is one way (ELF flags does not revert even when
.option pop is used), this is okay.

> +
> +  riscv_opts.tso = tso_value;
> +}
> +
>  /* This linked list records all enabled extensions, which are parsed from
>     the architecture string.  The architecture string can be set by the
>     -march option, the elf architecture attributes, and the --with-arch
> @@ -307,6 +321,10 @@ riscv_set_arch (const char *s)
>    riscv_set_rvc (false);
>    if (riscv_subset_supports (&riscv_rps_as, "c"))
>      riscv_set_rvc (true);
> +  
> +  riscv_set_tso (false);
> +  if (riscv_subset_supports (&riscv_rps_as, "ztso"))
> +    riscv_set_tso (true);
>  }
>  
>  /* Indicate -mabi option is explictly set.  */
> diff --git a/gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/attribute-015.d b/gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/attribute-015.d
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..73fc85b97ab
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/attribute-015.d
> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> +#as: -march=rv32i_ztso -march-attr
> +#readelf: -A
> +#source: empty.s
> +Attribute Section: riscv
> +File Attributes
> +  Tag_RISCV_arch: "rv32i2p0_ztso0p1"

I feel this a bit redundant because it does not provide anything new
compared to... such as "march-imply-v.d".  But since there's no "simple"
tests for default extension version, having this kind of test might be
an option.

If you keep this, please add "-misa-spec=20191213" to the assembler
invocation.

> diff --git a/include/elf/riscv.h b/include/elf/riscv.h
> index 9b3ea376ff3..d7b5c09d5c3 100644
> --- a/include/elf/riscv.h
> +++ b/include/elf/riscv.h
> @@ -121,6 +121,9 @@ END_RELOC_NUMBERS (R_RISCV_max)
>  /* RISC-V specific values for st_other.  */
>  #define STO_RISCV_VARIANT_CC 0x80
>  
> +/* File uses the TSO model. */
> +#define EF_RISCV_TSO 0x0010
> +
>  /* Additional section types.  */
>  #define SHT_RISCV_ATTRIBUTES 0x70000003 /* Section holds attributes.  */
>  
> diff --git a/include/opcode/riscv.h b/include/opcode/riscv.h
> index f1dabeaab8e..173b98d98be 100644
> --- a/include/opcode/riscv.h
> +++ b/include/opcode/riscv.h
> @@ -398,6 +398,7 @@ enum riscv_insn_class
>    INSN_CLASS_ZICBOP,
>    INSN_CLASS_ZICBOZ,
>    INSN_CLASS_H,
> +  INSN_CLASS_ZTSO,

Likewise (I don't support adding this).

>  };
>  
>  /* This structure holds information for a particular instruction.  */

Tsukasa
More information about the Binutils mailing list