[PATCH] gdb/arm: Handle lazy FPU register stacking
Torbjörn SVENSSON
torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com
Tue Sep 27 14:20:29 GMT 2022
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Sep 27 14:20:29 GMT 2022
- Previous message (by thread): PR29617, ld segfaults when bfd_close fails
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] gdb/arm: Handle lazy FPU register stacking
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Read LSPEN, ASPEN and LSPACT bits from FPCCR and use them for the first exception frame. All frames after will always have the FPU registers on the stack, regadless if lazy stacking is active or inactive. See "Lazy context save of FP state", in B1.5.7, also ARM AN298, supported by Cortex-M4F architecture for details on lazy FPU register stacking. The same conditions are valid for other Cortex-M cores with FPU. This patch has been verified on a STM32F4-Discovery board by: a) writing a non-zero value (lets use 0x1122334455667788 as an example) to all the D-registers in the main function b) configured the SysTick to fire c) in the SysTick_Handler, write some other value (lets use 0x0022446688aaccee as an example) to one of the D-registers (D0 as an example) and then do "SVC #0" d) in the SVC_Handler, write some other value (lets use 0x0099aabbccddeeff) to one of the D-registers (D0 as an example) In GDB, suspend the execution in the SVC_Handler function and compare the value of the D-registers for the SVC_handler frame and the SysTick_Handler frame. With the patch, the value of the modified D-register (D0) should be the new value (0x009..eff) on the SVC_Handler frame, and the intermediate value (0x002..cee) for the SysTick_Handler frame. Now compare the D-register value for the SysTick_Handler frame and the main frame. The main frame should have the initial value (0x112..788). Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com> Signed-off-by: Yvan ROUX <yvan.roux@foss.st.com> --- gdb/arm-tdep.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- gdb/frame.c | 2 ++ gdb/observable.c | 1 + gdb/observable.h | 3 +++ 4 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/arm-tdep.c b/gdb/arm-tdep.c index 2810232fcb8..43ce1a45782 100644 --- a/gdb/arm-tdep.c +++ b/gdb/arm-tdep.c @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ #endif static bool arm_debug; +static bool force_fpu_regs_from_stack = false; /* Print an "arm" debug statement. */ @@ -3337,6 +3338,17 @@ struct frame_unwind arm_stub_unwind = { arm_stub_unwind_sniffer }; + +/* The first time an exception frame is seen, the lazy stacking of the FPU + registers should be considered. Any following exception frames should not + consider the lazy stacking as the values will be put on the stack before + branching to the nested exception handler. */ +static void +reset_force_fpu_regs_from_stack () +{ + force_fpu_regs_from_stack = false; +} + /* Put here the code to store, into CACHE->saved_regs, the addresses of the saved registers of frame described by THIS_FRAME. CACHE is returned. */ @@ -3593,22 +3605,28 @@ arm_m_exception_cache (struct frame_info *this_frame) gdb_assert (safe_read_memory_unsigned_integer (FPCCR, ARM_INT_REGISTER_SIZE, byte_order, &fpccr)); + bool fpccr_aspen = bit (fpccr, 31); + bool fpccr_lspen = bit (fpccr, 30); bool fpccr_ts = bit (fpccr, 26); + bool fpccr_lspact = bit (fpccr, 0); - /* This code does not take into account the lazy stacking, see "Lazy - context save of FP state", in B1.5.7, also ARM AN298, supported - by Cortex-M4F architecture. - To fully handle this the FPCCR register (Floating-point Context - Control Register) needs to be read out and the bits ASPEN and - LSPEN could be checked to setup correct lazy stacked FP registers. - This register is located at address 0xE000EF34. */ + /* The rule is that the lazy bit is only valid for the first frame, + all other frames will have the fpu registers stacked. Just + consider the LSPEN, ASPEN and LSPACT bits for the first frame. + See "Lazy context save of FP state", in B1.5.7, also ARM AN298, + supported by Cortex-M4F architecture for details. */ + bool lazy_fpu_stacking_active = (fpccr_aspen && fpccr_lspen + && fpccr_lspact); /* Extended stack frame type used. */ - CORE_ADDR addr = unwound_sp + sp_r0_offset + 0x20; - for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++) + if (force_fpu_regs_from_stack || !lazy_fpu_stacking_active) { - cache->saved_regs[ARM_D0_REGNUM + i].set_addr (addr); - addr += 8; + CORE_ADDR addr = unwound_sp + sp_r0_offset + 0x20; + for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++) + { + cache->saved_regs[ARM_D0_REGNUM + i].set_addr (addr); + addr += 8; + } } cache->saved_regs[ARM_FPSCR_REGNUM].set_addr (unwound_sp + sp_r0_offset + 0x60); @@ -3617,11 +3635,14 @@ arm_m_exception_cache (struct frame_info *this_frame) && fpccr_ts) { /* Handle floating-point callee saved registers. */ - addr = unwound_sp + sp_r0_offset + 0x68; - for (int i = 8; i < 16; i++) + if (force_fpu_regs_from_stack || !lazy_fpu_stacking_active) { - cache->saved_regs[ARM_D0_REGNUM + i].set_addr (addr); - addr += 8; + CORE_ADDR addr = unwound_sp + sp_r0_offset + 0x68; + for (int i = 8; i < 16; i++) + { + cache->saved_regs[ARM_D0_REGNUM + i].set_addr (addr); + addr += 8; + } } arm_cache_set_active_sp_value (cache, tdep, @@ -3633,6 +3654,10 @@ arm_m_exception_cache (struct frame_info *this_frame) arm_cache_set_active_sp_value (cache, tdep, unwound_sp + sp_r0_offset + 0x68); } + + /* Lazy stacking handled, all other frames will have the FPU + registers on the stack. */ + force_fpu_regs_from_stack = true; } else { @@ -3746,6 +3771,7 @@ arm_m_exception_prev_register (struct frame_info *this_frame, return frame_unwind_got_constant (this_frame, ARM_PS_REGNUM, xpsr); } + return trad_frame_get_prev_register (this_frame, cache->saved_regs, prev_regnum); } @@ -10547,7 +10573,11 @@ arm_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch_list *arches) /* Add some default predicates. */ if (is_m) - frame_unwind_append_unwinder (gdbarch, &arm_m_exception_unwind); + { + gdb::observers::frame_cache_purged.attach + (reset_force_fpu_regs_from_stack, "arm_m_force_fpu_regs_from_stack"); + frame_unwind_append_unwinder (gdbarch, &arm_m_exception_unwind); + } frame_unwind_append_unwinder (gdbarch, &arm_stub_unwind); dwarf2_append_unwinders (gdbarch); frame_unwind_append_unwinder (gdbarch, &arm_exidx_unwind); diff --git a/gdb/frame.c b/gdb/frame.c index fc883b3239e..fdbaa946a34 100644 --- a/gdb/frame.c +++ b/gdb/frame.c @@ -2007,6 +2007,8 @@ reinit_frame_cache (void) select_frame (NULL); frame_stash_invalidate (); + gdb::observers::frame_cache_purged.notify (); + frame_debug_printf ("generation=%d", frame_cache_generation); } diff --git a/gdb/observable.c b/gdb/observable.c index 0bc8697f137..feee2b3f0a4 100644 --- a/gdb/observable.c +++ b/gdb/observable.c @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ DEFINE_OBSERVABLE (gdb_exiting); DEFINE_OBSERVABLE (connection_removed); DEFINE_OBSERVABLE (target_pre_wait); DEFINE_OBSERVABLE (target_post_wait); +DEFINE_OBSERVABLE (frame_cache_purged); } /* namespace observers */ } /* namespace gdb */ diff --git a/gdb/observable.h b/gdb/observable.h index 796bf2a43c6..d0c9fc90a66 100644 --- a/gdb/observable.h +++ b/gdb/observable.h @@ -263,6 +263,9 @@ extern observable <ptid_t /* ptid */> target_pre_wait; /* About to leave target_wait (). */ extern observable <ptid_t /* event_ptid */> target_post_wait; +/* Observer called when the frame cache gets purged. */ +extern observable<> frame_cache_purged; + } /* namespace observers */ } /* namespace gdb */ -- 2.25.1
- Previous message (by thread): PR29617, ld segfaults when bfd_close fails
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] gdb/arm: Handle lazy FPU register stacking
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list