PR32260: Improve estimate of number of strings
Alan Modra
amodra@gmail.com
Fri Oct 18 00:31:18 GMT 2024
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Oct 18 00:31:18 GMT 2024
- Previous message (by thread): PR32260: Improve estimate of number of strings
- Next message (by thread): PR32260: Improve estimate of number of strings
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 03:28:58PM +0200, Michael Matz wrote: > On Thu, 17 Oct 2024, Alan Modra wrote: > > If you used your upper bound then you'd need no resizing. > > > > Perhaps even better would be to use a more conservative estimate > > based on the total section size, then implement resizing in the normal > > fashion on inserting entries. > > You mean "less conservative", right? In the sense of less over-estimation > and hence not all content fitting into the table. Yes. > Anyway, I'll try to rewrite the code a little and see how the performance > fares. Thanks. I'm happy to do a little rewriting myself, but I'll not start doing that unless you tell me to go ahead. -- Alan Modra
- Previous message (by thread): PR32260: Improve estimate of number of strings
- Next message (by thread): PR32260: Improve estimate of number of strings
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list