[PATCH] Fix binutils build on hppa64-hpux with gcc-16
Jan Beulich
jbeulich@suse.com
Mon Dec 1 07:56:12 GMT 2025
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Mon Dec 1 07:56:12 GMT 2025
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] LoongArch: Add support for the ud macro instruction
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] Fix binutils build on hppa64-hpux with gcc-16
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 30.11.2025 18:27, John David Anglin wrote: > --- a/bfd/configure.ac > +++ b/bfd/configure.ac > @@ -205,6 +205,11 @@ ZW_GNU_GETTEXT_SISTER_DIR > AC_SUBST(HDEFINES) > AC_PROG_INSTALL > > +# Check for presense of long long > +AC_CHECK_TYPE([long long], > + [AC_DEFINE(HAVE_LONG_LONG, 1, [Define if you have the `long long' type.])], > + []) Why would this be needed? C99 guarantees existence of long long, doesn't it? > --- a/bfd/sysdep.h > +++ b/bfd/sysdep.h > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ > #include <stdlib.h> > #include <stddef.h> > #include <string.h> > +#include <strings.h> Iirc this isn't a standard header, and hence can't be included without being sure it exists. Given the patch description it's also not clear to me what the #include would be needed for. Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] LoongArch: Add support for the ud macro instruction
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] Fix binutils build on hppa64-hpux with gcc-16
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list