[PATCH] ld/MIPS: use distinguishable "section ordering test" names
Jan Beulich
jbeulich@suse.com
Mon Dec 8 07:46:54 GMT 2025
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Mon Dec 8 07:46:54 GMT 2025
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] ld/MIPS: use distinguishable "section ordering test" names
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] ld/MIPS: use distinguishable "section ordering test" names
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 05.12.2025 22:05, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Fri, 5 Dec 2025, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> Make clear from ld.log contents alone which of the *.rd files the output >> was matched against. > > This is so that *.sum files can be compared between targets and analogous > to the skip/anyskip/noskip feature of `run_dump_test'. Also "n32" has a > meaning while "n32p" does not. In the unlikely event one needs to look at > the actual dump file, they'll figure it out easily which is used. Define "easily". As a non-MIPS person I couldn't map it at all. I had to guess, and guess what - I guessed wrong the first time round. > So NAK. I will accept this, nevertheless. Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] ld/MIPS: use distinguishable "section ordering test" names
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] ld/MIPS: use distinguishable "section ordering test" names
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list