[PATCH 1/1] doc/riscv: Add description of disassembler options
Jan Beulich
jbeulich@suse.com
Wed Mar 26 13:02:31 GMT 2025
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Wed Mar 26 13:02:31 GMT 2025
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH 1/1] doc/riscv: Add description of disassembler options
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH 1/1] doc/riscv: Add description of disassembler options
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 26.03.2025 13:29, Marek Pikula wrote: > On 26.03.2025 12:50, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 26.03.2025 03:33, Nelson Chu wrote: >>> This is okay from my side, thanks. Btw, the privileged spec 1.9.1 support >>> was removed since binutils 2.43, so the option of objdump should also >>> remove it. The linker only recognizes it and then reports a warning that >>> it may conflict with other spec versions. >> It's imo okay to go in as-is. I'd like to note though that it looks as if >> originally the architecture specific sections were sorted alphabetically >> (and hence the addition might better go between PPC and VAX). That sorting >> was partly broken by ix86 having got renamed to x86 (but left in place), >> by aarch64 having got inserted after Arm, and by MIPS having ended up >> between PPC and VAX. >> > Indeed, I noticed the semi-alphabetic order but in the end I didn't > figure out the best place to insert it, so I just placed it at the end. > Shall I push v2 of this patch, or will you move it to the (semi) correct > spot before merging? Well, if I was the one to commit this I probably would. It being a RISC-V patch, I kind of expect Nelson to be the one to ultimately put this in, though. Nelson - unless you tell me otherwise, of course. Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH 1/1] doc/riscv: Add description of disassembler options
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH 1/1] doc/riscv: Add description of disassembler options
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list