[PATCH] gprof: Copy a simple test from glibc
H.J. Lu
hjl.tools@gmail.com
Fri Mar 28 15:23:53 GMT 2025
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Mar 28 15:23:53 GMT 2025
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] gprof: Copy a simple test from glibc
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] gprof: Copy a simple test from glibc
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 1:46 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote: > > On 07.03.2025 00:00, H.J. Lu wrote: > > Copy a simple gprof test from glibc to test the basic gprof functionality. > > > > PR gprof/32764 > > * Makefile.am (SUBDIRS): Add testsuite > > * configure.ac (AC_CONFIG_FILES): Removed. > > (AC_OUTPUT): Add Makefile testsuite/Makefile > > po/Makefile.in:po/Make-in. > > (AM_CONDITIONAL): Add NATIVE. > > * Makefile.in: Regenerated. > > * configure: Likewise. > > * testsuite/Makefile.am: New file. > > * testsuite/tst-gmon-gprof.sh: Likewise. > > * testsuite/tst-gmon.c: Likewise. > > * testsuite/Makefile.in: Generated. > > This and the other new test fail for me on both x86-64 systems I tried - the > f3 line isn't present in gprof output. I fear I don't have the time to > investigate from grounds up. IOW either I need pointers that make > investigation reasonably easy, or I'll propose to disable the tests again > until this is sorted. The one thing I did check is that the object file has > all the supposed calls to mcount(). If it matters, one system is using gcc5, > the other gcc7. > > Jan These tests work for me with gcc 5.4.1 and 7.4.1. Please try https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2025-March/140257.html -- H.J.
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] gprof: Copy a simple test from glibc
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] gprof: Copy a simple test from glibc
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list