[PATCH] gas: Add pushuniquesection and --unique-pushsection
Jan Beulich
jbeulich@suse.com
Fri May 16 07:19:43 GMT 2025
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri May 16 07:19:43 GMT 2025
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] gas: Add pushuniquesection and --unique-pushsection
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] gas: Add pushuniquesection and --unique-pushsection
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 16.05.2025 09:00, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 2:49 PM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote: >> >> On 16.05.2025 08:15, H.J. Lu wrote: >>> Linker kernel uses .pushsection directive extensively. But when >>> -ffunction-sections is used to build kernel, for >>> >>> __attribute__((always_inline)) >>> static void inline >>> test_section(void) >>> { >>> asm goto("jmp 1f\n" >>> "\t.pushsection .alt_section, \"ax\"\n" >> >> If you pass --sectname-subst to the assembler and use >> >> "\t.pushsection .alt_section%S, \"ax\"\n" > > This isn't very programmer friendly. One needs to change > the source and add a new assembler option. The source needs changing with your proposal, too. And the assembler option change isn't a difficult one. Plus one can use this with a range of already released versions, whereas your handling of a sub-case thereof would be available only with future releases. I think the benefit of adding special-case handling for something where a more generic solution already exists needs to be a bit wider than just the avoiding of the need to add a command line option (typically somewhere in a central place in a make system). Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] gas: Add pushuniquesection and --unique-pushsection
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] gas: Add pushuniquesection and --unique-pushsection
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list