[PATCH][binutils][2_42 1/2] x86: Improve TLS transition error check
Sam James
sam@gentoo.org
Wed May 21 14:07:04 GMT 2025
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Wed May 21 14:07:04 GMT 2025
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH][binutils][2_42 1/2] x86: Improve TLS transition error check
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH][binutils][2_42 1/2] x86: Improve TLS transition error check
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Harish.Sadineni@windriver.com writes: > From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> > > Provide detailed TLS transition errors when unsupported instructions are > used. Treat R_X86_64_CODE_4_GOTTPOFF and R_X86_64_CODE_6_GOTTPOFF as > R_X86_64_GOTTPOFF when performing TLS transition. Backports should IMHO always be "continuous", i.e. a commit backported to 2.42 must be backported to 2.43 (first). This doesn't seem to be on the 2.43 branch. (This is not a comment on whether we want to backport this at all.)
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH][binutils][2_42 1/2] x86: Improve TLS transition error check
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH][binutils][2_42 1/2] x86: Improve TLS transition error check
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list