[PATCH 2/2] z80-elf: support complex relocation symbols
H. Peter Anvin
hpa@zytor.com
Tue Oct 28 15:26:16 GMT 2025
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Oct 28 15:26:16 GMT 2025
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH 2/2] z80-elf: support complex relocation symbols
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH 2/2] z80-elf: support complex relocation symbols
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On October 28, 2025 2:11:18 AM PDT, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote: >On 27.10.2025 23:37, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 2025-10-26 15:06, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: >>> On Sun, 26 Oct 2025, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>> >>>>> Possibly, though as usually with BFD I suspect there's a catch; also I >>>>> guess a lot of complication in the MIPS backend comes from the use of said >>>>> odd n64 encoding (triple relocs in a single Elf64_Rela entry). >>>> >>>> I have done it as a prototype, it is trivial, at least for i386. No problems >>>> at all. >>>> >>>> It is literally a matter of moving the zeroing of a variable out of a loop. >>> >>> Does it work as expected, i.e. identical output section contents, when >>> you link to a srec output (such as with `ld --oformat=srec ...')? >>> >> >> I just tried it, and it does not; it errors out: >> >> /opt/z80/bin/z80-none-elf-ld: expreloc.o: in function `_start': >> (.text+0x1): undefined reference to >> `*:s15:CONSOLE_COLUMNS:+:s12:CONSOLE_ROWS:#ffffffff' >> /opt/z80/bin/z80-none-elf-ld: (.text+0x5): undefined reference to >> `-:s3:foo:s11:__IY_BASE__' >> /opt/z80/bin/z80-none-elf-ld: (.text+0x7): undefined reference to >> `+:s5:pizza:*:s15:CONSOLE_COLUMNS:+:s12:CONSOLE_ROWS:#ffffffff' >> /opt/z80/bin/z80-none-elf-ld: (.text+0xa): undefined reference to >> `+:s5:pizza:s13:CONSOLE_BYTES' >> /opt/z80/bin/z80-none-elf-ld: (.text+0x16): undefined reference to >> `+:+:s5:pizza:*:#00000002:s15:CONSOLE_COLUMNS:<<:+:s12:CONSOLE_ROWS:#ffffffff:#00000002' >> >> Linking to ELF and then using objcopy to srec works correctly, even with stock >> binutils ld (no modifications whatsoever). >> >> There are , in fact, no R_RELC anywhere in the object file. The relocations >> are all R_Z80_* but of course the type is set to SHT_RELC. >> >> Relocation section '.rela.text' at offset 0x270 contains 7 entries: >> Offset Info Type Sym.Value Sym. Name + Addend >> 00000001 00000c04 R_Z80_16 00000000 *:s15:CONSOLE_COL[...] + 0 >> 00000005 00000d02 R_Z80_8_DIS 00000000 -:s3:foo:s11:__IY[...] + 0 >> 00000007 00000e04 R_Z80_16 00000000 +:s5:pizza:*:s15:[...] + 0 >> 0000000a 00000f04 R_Z80_16 00000000 +:s5:pizza:s13:CO[...] + 0 >> 0000000d 00000a04 R_Z80_16 00000000 pizza + 730 >> 00000010 00000b04 R_Z80_16 00000000 CONSOLE_BYTES + 0 >> 00000016 00001004 R_Z80_16 00000000 +:+:s5:pizza:*:#0[...] + 0 > >Hmm, same for the MeP testcase. Things appear to be working from STT_RELC / >STT_SRELC, as checked for by elf_link_input_bfd(). Which then also explains >why things don't work when linking to other than an ELF output. Another >example where logic solely depending on input properties is wrongly tied >to the output format (just very recently I fixed a similar issue in section >merging). Of course the symbol _types_ wouldn't be representable in non- >ELF output; perhaps those symbols then may simply need dropping. (I'm not >sure they're overly useful in an ELF executable's static symbol table >either.) > >Interestingly in objdump's symbol table output I can't spot any notion of >STT_RELC / STT_SRELC (or even STT_TLS) at all, so the connection became >apparent to me only when using my own dumping tool. > >Jan They are useful if a postprocessor needs them.
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH 2/2] z80-elf: support complex relocation symbols
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH 2/2] z80-elf: support complex relocation symbols
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list