PR 25562: New binutils testsuite failures
Nick Clifton
nickc@redhat.com
Mon Mar 30 12:26:53 GMT 2020
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Mon Mar 30 12:26:53 GMT 2020
- Previous message (by thread): PR 25562: New binutils testsuite failures
- Next message (by thread): PR 25562: New binutils testsuite failures
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Jozef, > The test is working as expected, for those targets an objcopy of an executable > is not creating an exact copy of the original file. Ah, OK. > For the PE targets the datestamp in the executable file is not being copied by > objcopy. The old determinism problem. *sigh* We should probably just xfail these targets since we know that the binaries can never be the same. > For the MIPS targets, objcopy has added the names of output sections to the > string table, where in the linked executable they were not in the string table. Where were the names stored then, if not in the string table ? Or did the objcopy actually add new section symbols ? This does sound like something that the MIPS maintainers ought to investigate and decide whether it is a real bug or not. > I can file bugzillas for these if you would like. No, that should not be necessary. I will check in an update for the PE targets once I have tested it locally. Cheers Nick
- Previous message (by thread): PR 25562: New binutils testsuite failures
- Next message (by thread): PR 25562: New binutils testsuite failures
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list