[PATCH 4/6] x86: use template for AVX/AVX512 floating point comparison insns
H.J. Lu
hjl.tools@gmail.com
Fri Mar 6 15:32:00 GMT 2020
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Mar 6 15:32:00 GMT 2020
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH 4/6] x86: use template for AVX/AVX512 floating point comparison insns
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH 6/6] x86: use template for AVX512 integer comparison insns
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 6:57 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote: > > On 06.03.2020 15:44, H.J. Lu wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 12:13 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote: > >> > >> These all follow an almost common pattern, again with the exception of > >> being commutative, which can be easily taken care of. > >> > >> Note that, as an intended side effect (and in fact one of the reason to > >> introduce templates), AVX long-form pseudo-ops get introduced alongside > >> the already existing AVX512 ones. > > > > What did you mean by that? > > That from the current set of pseudos not all are supported in the > AVX case. IIRC the set got expanded (also covering the AVX variants) > when AVX512 was added to the SDM. > > > We need testcases to show what were missing > > before and they are added now. > > Sigh - I can do so of course, but it's tedious and pretty pointless > with the templated templates now guaranteeing consistency. > Please do that. OK with added testcases. Thanks. -- H.J.
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH 4/6] x86: use template for AVX/AVX512 floating point comparison insns
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH 6/6] x86: use template for AVX512 integer comparison insns
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list