Home Original page

[PATCH v4] Add AMD znver6 processor support

Kalvakuntla, Umesh Umesh.Kalvakuntla@amd.com
Tue Nov 25 08:38:40 GMT 2025 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2025 2:00 PM
> To: Kalvakuntla, Umesh <Umesh.Kalvakuntla@amd.com>
> Cc: Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh <Ganesh.Gopalasubramanian@amd.com>;
> binutils@sourceware.org; H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>; Jiang, Haochen
> <haochen.jiang@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Add AMD znver6 processor support
> 
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution
> when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
> 
> 
> On 25.11.2025 07:18, Jiang, Haochen wrote:
> > And another question is I am wondering if you need to comment out
> > CpuUnused, it might be spoiled after your patch based on trunk. Please
> > confirm on that by rebasing to the latest trunk and compile Binutils.
> 
> Yes, this looks to be necessary (I have this in the first of my patches to properly
> respect APX-NCI-NDD-NF), and without it I wonder how you managed to build (let
> alone test) your change 

Hi,

I've tested the patch locally after rebasing. But I had to do the comment part myself.
Apologies, I assumed the build config you do in buildbots is different, to comment this.
I just went through older commits and learnt that it is being commented and 
uncommented on a needly basis.

> Alternatively, to avoid you needing to fiddle with that, we
> could put your patch on top of my series (which of course I first need to post, which
> in turn I want to do only once "x86: drop a few excess AVX512VL from opcode
> table" has gone in).
>
Yes, I'm okay with this.

Thank you,
Umesh
More information about the Binutils mailing list