[PATCH] x86: Handle extra bit for i386_cpu_flags
Jiang, Haochen
haochen.jiang@intel.com
Wed Nov 26 06:25:32 GMT 2025
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Wed Nov 26 06:25:32 GMT 2025
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] x86: Handle extra bit for i386_cpu_flags
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] x86: Handle extra bit for i386_cpu_flags
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2025 2:23 PM > > On 26.11.2025 03:58, Haochen Jiang wrote: > > I suppose we will need this handle in the very near future due > > to AMD AVX512-BMM and foreseeable APX_NCI_NDD_NF addition leading > > to yet another bit in i386_cpu_flags. > > > > Ok for trunk? > > Well, it is (necessarily) part of my patch; I don't see a strong > need for it to go in separately. (But I also wouldn't strongly > mind.) That would be great. I suppose we are still not that ready for that. I am happy to just have that part within your patch. Thx, Haochen
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] x86: Handle extra bit for i386_cpu_flags
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] x86: Handle extra bit for i386_cpu_flags
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list