Message380142
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Mark.Shannon, barry, corona10, methane, nascheme, pablogsal, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2020-11-01.14:34:08 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1604241249.02.0.848673195735.issue42115@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> because you'd cache a pointer to the specific `+` operator implementation You should have a look at "INCA: Inline Caching meets Quickening in Python 3.3": https://bugs.python.org/issue14757 Stefan Brunthaler wrote a paper on his work: "Inline Caching Meets Quickening" (Published in ECOOP 2010) https://publications.sba-research.org/publications/ecoop10.pdf |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2020-11-01 14:34:09 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, barry, nascheme, methane, Mark.Shannon, yselivanov, corona10, pablogsal |
| 2020-11-01 14:34:09 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1604241249.02.0.848673195735.issue42115@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2020-11-01 14:34:09 | vstinner | link | issue42115 messages |
| 2020-11-01 14:34:08 | vstinner | create | |