Message385566
| Author | AdamGold |
|---|---|
| Recipients | AdamGold, eric.araujo, kj, lemburg, orsenthil, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date | 2021-01-23.22:25:20 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1611440720.84.0.522913575559.issue42967@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> That doesn’t feel necessary to me. I suspect most links use &, some use ;, nothing else is valid at the moment and I don’t expect a new separator to suddenly appear. IMO the boolean parameter to also recognize ; was better. That's reasonable. However, I think that we are making this change in order to treat the semicolon as a "custom" separator. In that case, why not let the developer decide on a different custom separator for their own use cases? What's the difference between a semicolon and something else? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2021-01-23 22:25:20 | AdamGold | set | recipients: + AdamGold, lemburg, orsenthil, vstinner, eric.araujo, serhiy.storchaka, kj |
| 2021-01-23 22:25:20 | AdamGold | set | messageid: <1611440720.84.0.522913575559.issue42967@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2021-01-23 22:25:20 | AdamGold | link | issue42967 messages |
| 2021-01-23 22:25:20 | AdamGold | create | |