Message381670
| Author | p-ganssle |
|---|---|
| Recipients | akira, barry, ju-sh, maxballenger, mdk, p-ganssle, pitrou, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, thejcannon, victorg, ypank |
| Date | 2020-11-23.15:11:05 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1606144265.95.0.827719594487.issue21041@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I think you may have confused my thoughts as to why this might be considered ambiguous with an actual suggestion for what the semantics should be.
I think that we should stick with `p.parents[x] == tuple(p.parents)[x]` for any valid value of `x`, which means that `p.parents[-1]` will always be `Path('.')` for any non-empty `p`. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2020-11-23 15:11:06 | p-ganssle | set | recipients: + p-ganssle, barry, pitrou, r.david.murray, akira, serhiy.storchaka, mdk, thejcannon, ju-sh, victorg, maxballenger, ypank |
| 2020-11-23 15:11:05 | p-ganssle | set | messageid: <1606144265.95.0.827719594487.issue21041@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2020-11-23 15:11:05 | p-ganssle | link | issue21041 messages |
| 2020-11-23 15:11:05 | p-ganssle | create | |