[syslinux] Syslinux 5 (i)pxelinux.0 unnecessary PATH requests
Shao Miller
sha0.miller at gmail.com
Wed Dec 12 08:32:34 PST 2012
More information about the Syslinux mailing list
Wed Dec 12 08:32:34 PST 2012
- Previous message: [syslinux] Syslinux 5 (i)pxelinux.0 unnecessary PATH requests
- Next message: [syslinux] Syslinux 5 (i)pxelinux.0 unnecessary PATH requests
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 12/12/2012 11:17, Shao Miller wrote: > On 12/12/2012 10:48, Arends, R.R. wrote: >> >> good idea, but imho this still involves in making extra requests to >> the backend and rather 'hacky' chain->chain->chain stuff to make it >> harder to understand for my fellow cowokers. >> >> if anyone can point me to the right source files to edit and hardcode >> the path, i would really appreciate it. i know thats also hacky, but >> thats easy to do since we already have some custom patches which we >> always apply. > > As mentioned elsethread, you are overriding the path by using 210. That > is to say, you are setting the current working directory. The current > working directory is used for opening files with relative paths (in a > few different operating systems, even). If you don't want to do this, > don't do it. :) > For example, there is no reason for you to set 210 since you can hard-code the iPXE script, which you are already doing: #!ipxe #... # Do not set 210 set filename http://boot.xxx.nl/mods/pxelinux.0 chain ${filename} Then ldlinux.c32 is searched-for where pxelinux.0 lives. - Shao Miller
- Previous message: [syslinux] Syslinux 5 (i)pxelinux.0 unnecessary PATH requests
- Next message: [syslinux] Syslinux 5 (i)pxelinux.0 unnecessary PATH requests
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Syslinux mailing list