Issue11256
Created on 2011-02-20 12:11 by daniel.urban, last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| issue11256.diff | daniel.urban, 2011-02-20 13:32 | Patch (py3k branch) | review | |
| issue11256_2.diff | daniel.urban, 2011-02-26 12:54 | Patch with more tests | review | |
| issue11256_py27.patch | Trundle, 2011-02-27 03:20 | review | ||
| issue11256_3.diff | daniel.urban, 2011-02-27 10:09 | New patch with corrected fix and more tests | review | |
| issue11256_4.patch | daniel.urban, 2011-03-18 17:20 | Patch for the new mercurial repository | review | |
| Messages (7) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg128902 - (view) | Author: Daniel Urban (daniel.urban) * ![]() |
Date: 2011-02-20 12:11 | |
inspect.getcallargs raises TypeError if given a function with only **kwargs, and some keyword arguments:
Python 3.3a0 (py3k:88451, Feb 20 2011, 12:37:22)
[GCC 4.4.3] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>>
>>> from inspect import getcallargs
>>>
>>> def f(**kwargs): pass
...
>>> f(a=1, b=2)
>>>
>>> getcallargs(f, a=1, b=2)
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: f() takes no arguments (2 given)
In line 946 of inspect.py the "num_args == 0 and num_total" condition is true: the function expects 0 positional arguments and got more than zero arguments, but in this case these are keyword arguments, so it shouldn't raise TypeError.
|
|||
| msg128907 - (view) | Author: Daniel Urban (daniel.urban) * ![]() |
Date: 2011-02-20 13:32 | |
Here is a patch. It also includes tests that would have detected this bug. It also corrects a case when getcallargs raised an exception with a different message (there are tests also for this):
>>> def f(**kwargs): pass
...
>>> f(1, a=2)
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: f() takes exactly 0 positional arguments (2 given)
>>>
>>> getcallargs(f, 1, a=2)
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: f() takes no arguments (2 given)
There is a comment in the patch about this case: the message given by Python is also incorrect, because it says that 2 positional arguments are given, but there was only 1 positional argument (the other was a keyword argument). The patch currently handles this case by producing the same (incorrect) message as Python.
|
|||
| msg129538 - (view) | Author: Daniel Urban (daniel.urban) * ![]() |
Date: 2011-02-26 12:54 | |
Updated patch with extra tests. |
|||
| msg129608 - (view) | Author: Andreas Stührk (Trundle) * | Date: 2011-02-27 03:20 | |
Confirmed under Python 2.7, 3.2 and 3.3. Patch looks good to me. Attached is a patch for 2.7. |
|||
| msg129620 - (view) | Author: Daniel Urban (daniel.urban) * ![]() |
Date: 2011-02-27 10:09 | |
I found another case, when this is a problem: if there are no **kwargs, but there are some keyword-only arguments:
>>> def f(*, a, b): pass
...
>>> f(a=1, b=2)
>>>
>>> getcallargs(f, a=1, b=2)
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: f() takes no arguments (2 given)
The attached issue11256_3.diff patch also fixes this problem, and adds tests that would have detected this case.
|
|||
| msg131340 - (view) | Author: Daniel Urban (daniel.urban) * ![]() |
Date: 2011-03-18 17:20 | |
Updated the patch for mercurial. |
|||
| msg132439 - (view) | Author: Roundup Robot (python-dev) ![]() |
Date: 2011-03-28 22:41 | |
New changeset 57e99f5f5e8f by Benjamin Peterson in branch '3.2': Correct handling of functions with only kwarg args in getcallargs (closes #11256) http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/57e99f5f5e8f New changeset b19d76d9d2a7 by Benjamin Peterson in branch '2.7': Correct handling of functions with only kwarg args in getcallargs (closes #11256) http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/b19d76d9d2a7 |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:57:13 | admin | set | github: 55465 |
| 2011-03-28 22:41:06 | python-dev | set | status: open -> closed nosy:
+ python-dev resolution: fixed |
| 2011-03-18 17:20:31 | daniel.urban | set | files:
+ issue11256_4.patch nosy: gsakkis, benjamin.peterson, Trundle, daniel.urban messages: + msg131340 |
| 2011-02-27 10:09:12 | daniel.urban | set | files:
+ issue11256_3.diff nosy: gsakkis, benjamin.peterson, Trundle, daniel.urban messages: + msg129620 |
| 2011-02-27 03:20:32 | Trundle | set | files:
+ issue11256_py27.patch nosy: + Trundle messages: + msg129608 |
| 2011-02-26 12:54:19 | daniel.urban | set | files:
+ issue11256_2.diff nosy: gsakkis, benjamin.peterson, daniel.urban messages: + msg129538 |
| 2011-02-20 13:32:18 | daniel.urban | set | files:
+ issue11256.diff messages:
+ msg128907 |
| 2011-02-20 12:11:08 | daniel.urban | create | |
