Issue15257
Created on 2012-07-05 22:40 by hydroflask, last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| mypatch.diff | hydroflask, 2012-07-05 22:40 | review | ||
| Messages (3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg164701 - (view) | Author: (hydroflask) | Date: 2012-07-05 22:40 | |
the `pystack`, `pystackv`, and `printframe` macros in the sample gdbinit file distributed with python are too fragile. this patch (which relies on gdb 7) is much more robust. |
|||
| msg222690 - (view) | Author: Mark Lawrence (BreamoreBoy) * | Date: 2014-07-10 19:24 | |
I'm assuming that we need a patch review on this, sadly it means nothing to me. |
|||
| msg314972 - (view) | Author: Skip Montanaro (skip.montanaro) *  |
Date: 2018-04-05 09:16 | |
I would prefer if these macros remain standalone (and thus fragile). Despite Python support in gdb, not everyone (more than five years after the bug report) don't use a gdb which was built --with-python. There is better support for gdb integration elsewhere in the CPython code base: Tools/gdb/libpython.py. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:57:32 | admin | set | github: 59462 |
| 2018-04-05 09:16:06 | skip.montanaro | set | status: open -> closed nosy:
+ skip.montanaro resolution: rejected |
| 2014-07-10 19:24:07 | BreamoreBoy | set | nosy:
+ BreamoreBoy messages:
+ msg222690 |
| 2012-07-06 13:16:00 | pitrou | set | nosy:
+ dmalcolm |
| 2012-07-06 00:23:50 | jcea | set | nosy:
+ jcea |
| 2012-07-05 22:44:04 | hydroflask | set | versions: + Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 |
| 2012-07-05 22:43:30 | hydroflask | set | components: + Demos and Tools, - None |
| 2012-07-05 22:40:29 | hydroflask | create | |