Issue31536
Created on 2017-09-20 18:37 by pitrou, last changed 2022-04-11 14:58 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Pull Requests | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| URL | Status | Linked | Edit |
| PR 3677 | closed | pitrou, 2017-09-20 18:39 | |
| PR 3678 | merged | pitrou, 2017-09-20 19:28 | |
| PR 3797 | merged | python-dev, 2017-09-28 10:41 | |
| Messages (12) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg302649 - (view) | Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) * ![]() |
Date: 2017-09-20 18:37 | |
`make regen-opcode` always writes the destination unconditionally, after which `make` thinks it has to rebuild everything. |
|||
| msg302651 - (view) | Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) * ![]() |
Date: 2017-09-20 18:42 | |
Note that at least `make regen-ast` will also need to be changed in order to reduce build times on Travis-CI. |
|||
| msg302652 - (view) | Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) * ![]() |
Date: 2017-09-20 18:53 | |
Looks like `pgen` will also have to be changed, which is more annoying as it's written in C... Perhaps another approach can be used that will use a separate utility to do the copying if the contents changed? |
|||
| msg302653 - (view) | Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) * ![]() |
Date: 2017-09-20 19:33 | |
Posted https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/3678 which uses a separate utility. It seems to save 1 minute off the build step on Travis-CI. |
|||
| msg302654 - (view) | Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) * ![]() |
Date: 2017-09-20 19:34 | |
Note that GNU install (`install -C`) would probably do the trick, but is not necessarily installed on the build system. |
|||
| msg302662 - (view) | Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * ![]() |
Date: 2017-09-20 21:57 | |
New changeset b091bec824137f286b22084be5f8d397d21b9abb by Victor Stinner (Antoine Pitrou) in branch 'master': bpo-31536: Avoid wholesale rebuild after `make regen-all` (#3678) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/b091bec824137f286b22084be5f8d397d21b9abb |
|||
| msg302663 - (view) | Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * ![]() |
Date: 2017-09-20 22:25 | |
If it works well, maybe it's worth it to backport the change to the 3.6 branch. We still backport a lot of changes to 3.6. But maybe wait until 3.6.3 final is released? |
|||
| msg302665 - (view) | Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) * ![]() |
Date: 2017-09-20 22:35 | |
> If it works well, maybe it's worth it to backport the change to the 3.6 branch. We still backport a lot of changes to 3.6. But maybe wait until 3.6.3 final is released? Fair enough. Does someone want to do the backport? :-) |
|||
| msg302670 - (view) | Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * ![]() |
Date: 2017-09-21 07:24 | |
I may do the backport, or ask the bot to do it. Right now I prefer to check if everything is fine on all CI. |
|||
| msg303203 - (view) | Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) * ![]() |
Date: 2017-09-28 09:34 | |
Victor, are the buildbots fine now? |
|||
| msg303204 - (view) | Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * ![]() |
Date: 2017-09-28 09:36 | |
> Victor, are the buildbots fine now? I didn't see anything wrong on buildbots, nor Travis CI/AppVeyor on PRs. So we can now backport the "optimization". Do you want to do it, Antoine? |
|||
| msg303222 - (view) | Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) * ![]() |
Date: 2017-09-28 11:21 | |
New changeset ec3d34c5b2feb10cb4d7606a10d81c178c3afce3 by Antoine Pitrou (Miss Islington (bot)) in branch '3.6': [3.6] bpo-31536: Avoid wholesale rebuild after `make regen-all` (GH-3678) (#3797) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/ec3d34c5b2feb10cb4d7606a10d81c178c3afce3 |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:58:52 | admin | set | github: 75717 |
| 2017-09-28 11:21:50 | pitrou | set | status: open -> closed stage: patch review -> resolved resolution: fixed versions: + Python 3.6 |
| 2017-09-28 11:21:34 | pitrou | set | messages: + msg303222 |
| 2017-09-28 10:41:38 | python-dev | set | stage: resolved -> patch review pull_requests: + pull_request3782 |
| 2017-09-28 09:36:41 | vstinner | set | messages: + msg303204 |
| 2017-09-28 09:34:42 | pitrou | set | messages: + msg303203 |
| 2017-09-21 07:24:53 | vstinner | set | nosy:
+ zach.ware |
| 2017-09-21 07:24:33 | vstinner | set | status: closed -> open resolution: fixed -> (no value) messages: + msg302670 |
| 2017-09-20 22:35:31 | pitrou | set | messages: + msg302665 |
| 2017-09-20 22:25:12 | vstinner | set | messages: + msg302663 |
| 2017-09-20 22:00:42 | pitrou | set | status: open -> closed resolution: fixed stage: patch review -> resolved |
| 2017-09-20 21:57:58 | vstinner | set | nosy:
+ vstinner messages: + msg302662 |
| 2017-09-20 19:34:15 | pitrou | set | messages: + msg302654 |
| 2017-09-20 19:33:20 | pitrou | set | messages: + msg302653 |
| 2017-09-20 19:28:39 | pitrou | set | title: `make regen-opcode` triggers wholesale rebuild -> `make regen-all` triggers wholesale rebuild |
| 2017-09-20 19:28:21 | pitrou | set | pull_requests: + pull_request3667 |
| 2017-09-20 18:53:35 | pitrou | set | messages: + msg302652 |
| 2017-09-20 18:42:45 | pitrou | set | messages: + msg302651 |
| 2017-09-20 18:39:32 | pitrou | set | keywords:
+ patch stage: patch review pull_requests: + pull_request3666 |
| 2017-09-20 18:37:37 | pitrou | create | |
