cgitb.html() returns HTML code viewable in a browser.

It would be nice to improve the rendering to have something more readable (increase space between each call, increase contrast for the source code) and more modern.

You can see the difference in the attached screenshot.

current.png is a screenshot of the html shown in a browser with 3.8 branch
next.png is a screenshot of the modified cgitb.html() function.

It's difficult to discuss colors, maybe because I'm partially colorblind :-), each people has different taste.

Instead of hardcoding colors, would it be better to use CSS instead.

> Instead of hardcoding colors, would it be better to use CSS instead.

I agree with you. The current source code contains hardcoded colors. I
could add an optional parameter to change the css for the cgitb.html()
function:

def html(einfo, context=5, css=_DEFAULT_CSS):
   ...

_DEFAULT_CSS would be a string with the equivalent of the hardcoded style.

For this change, I will modify the html code to replace some
deprecated tags (like big or font) by supported tags.

What do you think about it (new optional parameter and html update)?

I added the optional parameter to cgitb.html() function and removed the
hardcoded css from the html code.

I think there are still several improvements to do:
- add documentation for the new parameter of cgitb.html()
- add the same parameter to cgitb.enable() (?)
- remove the cgitb.grey() function because it's not used anymore (?)
- perhaps minor improvements of html and css code

What do you think about it?

cgi/cgitb are deprecated as per PEP 594, so there won't be further enhancements to them.

nosy: + iritkatriel
messages: + msg415058

resolution: wont fix
stage: patch review -> resolved

messages: + msg316577