Hello everybody!

Making a searching on GitHub: is:open label:"CLA not signed" 

We can see that there are some PR opened with CLA not signed label.
The newest is 22 days ago and the oldest is from May 8, 2017.

I can closed it if you consider apropiate

There were cases in the past where CLA was signed but there was mismatch in the bpo details and GitHub usernames linked due to which bot didn't change it to CLA signed. I would request this to be discussed in other channels like https://discuss.python.org/c/core-workflow or zulip core-workflow chat or mailing list. This issue could be closed since there is nothing that could be done in the bug tracker here. These problems might be solved by using CLA assistant. Closing a PR needs relevant access and I guess Brett is also reviewing PRs where CLA is not signed.

> I would request this to be discussed in other channels like https://discuss.python.org/c/core-workflow or zulip core-workflow chat or mailing list.

Ok. It good for you if I send this issue to https://discuss.python.org/c/core-workflow?

Then, I close this issue.

Brett would like to reduce the number of PRs, maybe we need to ask to the council about that point.

I'm already going through the "CLA not signed" issues and cleaning them up, so there's no need for anyone to duplicate my work.

And this is not a steering council concern but a core-workflow concern.

stage: resolved