Issue36620
Created on 2019-04-12 20:09 by CharlesMerriam, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Pull Requests | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| URL | Status | Linked | Edit |
| PR 13210 | closed | python-dev, 2019-05-08 20:01 | |
| Messages (8) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg340107 - (view) | Author: Charles Merriam (CharlesMerriam) | Date: 2019-04-12 20:09 | |
On page: https://docs.python.org/3.8/library/itertools.html In the heading summary, in the "Iterators terminating on the shortest input sequence:" section, in the "zip_longest()" table row, in the "Arguments" column, the text "p, q, ..." should be "p, q, ... [, fillvalue=None]" |
|||
| msg340113 - (view) | Author: Cheryl Sabella (cheryl.sabella) * ![]() |
Date: 2019-04-12 21:27 | |
Good catch! In the same section, accumulate() is missing the `initial` argument. Would you be interested in submitting a pull request for this? |
|||
| msg340132 - (view) | Author: Charles Merriam (Charles.Merriam) | Date: 2019-04-12 23:11 | |
Hi Cheryl, No. I've dealt with the Team Python long cycles for random pull requests before. Charles On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 2:27 PM Cheryl Sabella <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Cheryl Sabella <cheryl.sabella@gmail.com> added the comment: > > Good catch! In the same section, accumulate() is missing the `initial` > argument. > > Would you be interested in submitting a pull request for this? > > ---------- > nosy: +cheryl.sabella > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> > <https://bugs.python.org/issue36620> > _______________________________________ > |
|||
| msg340134 - (view) | Author: Cheryl Sabella (cheryl.sabella) * ![]() |
Date: 2019-04-12 23:59 | |
Thanks, Charles. I'm going to assign this to @Mariatta for the sprints. |
|||
| msg341928 - (view) | Author: Ying Wang (yingw787) * | Date: 2019-05-08 18:54 | |
I would like to take a stab at this as a first-time CPython contributor. |
|||
| msg341957 - (view) | Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) * ![]() |
Date: 2019-05-09 03:40 | |
Sorry, I don't want to do this in the summary table. The goal of the table is to provide a minimal overview to help select the appropriate itertool and to provide a fast link to the details given below. |
|||
| msg341959 - (view) | Author: Ying Wang (yingw787) * | Date: 2019-05-09 03:46 | |
@rhettinger should this issue be closed if no action is to be taken? If so, should I manually close the pull request referencing this issue, or will that be automatically handled by the Python bug tracker? |
|||
| msg342142 - (view) | Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) * ![]() |
Date: 2019-05-10 23:31 | |
I'll take care of it. Thank you. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:59:13 | admin | set | github: 80801 |
| 2019-05-10 23:31:50 | rhettinger | set | status: open -> closed messages:
+ msg342142 |
| 2019-05-09 03:46:20 | yingw787 | set | messages: + msg341959 |
| 2019-05-09 03:40:43 | rhettinger | set | assignee: Mariatta -> rhettinger messages: + msg341957 |
| 2019-05-08 20:01:26 | python-dev | set | keywords:
+ patch stage: needs patch -> patch review pull_requests: + pull_request13121 |
| 2019-05-08 18:54:59 | yingw787 | set | nosy:
+ yingw787 messages: + msg341928 |
| 2019-04-12 23:59:21 | cheryl.sabella | set | assignee: docs@python -> Mariatta |
| 2019-04-12 23:15:09 | xtreak | set | nosy:
+ rhettinger |
| 2019-04-12 23:11:50 | Charles.Merriam | set | nosy:
+ Charles.Merriam messages: + msg340132 |
| 2019-04-12 21:27:16 | cheryl.sabella | set | nosy:
+ cheryl.sabella messages: + msg340113 |
| 2019-04-12 20:13:14 | SilentGhost | set | stage: needs patch versions: + Python 3.7 |
| 2019-04-12 20:09:17 | CharlesMerriam | create | |
