Issue516762
Created on 2002-02-13 03:22 by phr, last changed 2022-04-10 16:04 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (7) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg53476 - (view) | Author: paul rubin (phr) | Date: 2002-02-13 03:22 | |
There doesn't seem to be any reasonable way to search a string backwards for a regular expression, starting from a given character position. I notice that the underlying C regular expression implemention supports a direction flag. I propose adding a direction flag to the search function on match objects: r = re.compile(...) m = re.search(str, startpos=5000, endpos=-1, dir=-1) would search in str for r, starting at location 5000 and searching backwards through location 0 (the beginning of the string). This is useful in (for example) text editors where you want to be able to search forwards or backwards, or if you're parsing an html file and see a </table> and want to find the matching <table>, etc. phr |
|||
| msg53477 - (view) | Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) * ![]() |
Date: 2002-03-27 20:32 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=21627 Moved to feature requests tracker. |
|||
| msg53478 - (view) | Author: paul rubin (phr) | Date: 2003-09-29 19:53 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=72053 Another way to do this would be add a direction flag to the regexp itself, like re.R (for reverse) if R isn't already in use: group = re.search(pat, str, start, end, re.R) or something like that. I continue to want this feature. It's very handy for writing web scrapers, which I do fairly frequently. |
|||
| msg72784 - (view) | Author: Matthew Barnett (mrabarnett) * ![]() |
Date: 2008-09-08 17:26 | |
Does this request still stand? I'm working on the re module at the moment. |
|||
| msg72832 - (view) | Author: Amaury Forgeot d'Arc (amaury.forgeotdarc) * ![]() |
Date: 2008-09-09 09:05 | |
Why not? I needed such a feature some time ago. But if possible, it should be a keyword argument: re.search(..., backwards=True) similar to list.sort(reverse=True) |
|||
| msg73549 - (view) | Author: Matthew Barnett (mrabarnett) * ![]() |
Date: 2008-09-22 00:51 | |
Implemented as part of #3825. |
|||
| msg225871 - (view) | Author: Adam Bartoš (Drekin) * | Date: 2014-08-25 10:38 | |
Hello, I wanted to use this feature and found this issue. It is marked as closed, being a duplicate of another closed issue. However the feature is actually not present. In 2008 it was planned to be added by Matthew Barnett in #3825, but the work of improving re module moved to bigger project under #2636 which resulted in regex package to be evenually included in stdlib. So unless regex is included in stdlib, one should try regex package (e.g. pip install regex). I've put here this summary just in case there is someone like me who looked for the feature and found this issue. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-10 16:04:59 | admin | set | github: 36095 |
| 2014-08-25 10:38:33 | Drekin | set | nosy:
+ Drekin messages: + msg225871 |
| 2008-09-22 01:00:03 | benjamin.peterson | set | status: open -> closed resolution: duplicate superseder: Major reworking of Python 2.5.2 re module |
| 2008-09-22 00:51:46 | mrabarnett | set | messages: + msg73549 |
| 2008-09-21 12:00:33 | timehorse | set | nosy: + timehorse |
| 2008-09-09 09:05:26 | amaury.forgeotdarc | set | nosy:
+ amaury.forgeotdarc messages: + msg72832 |
| 2008-09-08 17:26:22 | mrabarnett | set | nosy:
+ mrabarnett messages: + msg72784 |
| 2002-02-13 03:22:55 | phr | create | |

