Message219877
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Sebastian.Kreft.Deezer, docs@python, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, pitrou, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2014-06-06.12:28:01 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1402057682.7.0.57174343078.issue21596@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Probably this was the intended behavior as I see there's a test case for that. If such, then I would propose to document that behavior.
The code has an explicit check:
if not fs:
raise ValueError('Set of coroutines/Futures is empty.')
And yes, the behaviour is tested by test_asyncio.
Attached patch changes mention this behaviour in the documentation. Does it look correct? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-06-06 12:28:02 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, gvanrossum, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, docs@python, yselivanov, Sebastian.Kreft.Deezer |
| 2014-06-06 12:28:02 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1402057682.7.0.57174343078.issue21596@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-06-06 12:28:02 | vstinner | link | issue21596 messages |
| 2014-06-06 12:28:02 | vstinner | create | |