Message280702
| Author | r.david.murray |
|---|---|
| Recipients | docs@python, r.david.murray, viorel |
| Date | 2016-11-13.16:43:01 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1479055381.6.0.996322835514.issue28677@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
"instance parent class" is not terminology used in our docs as far as I remember. "instance's class" would be more in line with the other docs. That would solve the pronoun reference problem more succinctly, I think. How about this version, which also improves the awkward phrasing, but without using em-dashes: "When a non-data attribute of an instance is referenced, the instance's class is searched." |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-11-13 16:43:01 | r.david.murray | set | recipients: + r.david.murray, docs@python, viorel |
| 2016-11-13 16:43:01 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1479055381.6.0.996322835514.issue28677@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-11-13 16:43:01 | r.david.murray | link | issue28677 messages |
| 2016-11-13 16:43:01 | r.david.murray | create | |