Message322476
| Author | jdemeyer |
|---|---|
| Recipients | jdemeyer, methane |
| Date | 2018-07-27.09:25:46 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1532683546.65.0.56676864532.issue34245@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Isn't it useful to avoid accidental change while open files with editor for just reading? Why would that argument apply to a binary file (and only to binary files)? > Is there any real world problem about read-only library? It makes it slightly harder to remove a Python installation. Depending on the OS, you'll get a failure or require some additional confirmation. Furthermore, it's very non-standard. Even if that's not a problem by itself, Python should just install things in the standard way. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-07-27 09:25:46 | jdemeyer | set | recipients: + jdemeyer, methane |
| 2018-07-27 09:25:46 | jdemeyer | set | messageid: <1532683546.65.0.56676864532.issue34245@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-07-27 09:25:46 | jdemeyer | link | issue34245 messages |
| 2018-07-27 09:25:46 | jdemeyer | create | |