In Makefile.pre.in, there is this:

# Shared libraries must be installed with executable mode on some systems;
# rather than figuring out exactly which, we always give them executable mode.
# Also, making them read-only seems to be a good idea...
INSTALL_SHARED= ${INSTALL} -m 555

Installing libraries read-only is very non-standard (I'm not aware of any other build system which does that). Python should just use the more standard 755 install mode.

Isn't it useful to avoid accidental change while open files with editor for just reading?

Is there any real world problem about read-only library?

> Isn't it useful to avoid accidental change while open files with editor for just reading?

Why would that argument apply to a binary file (and only to binary files)?

> Is there any real world problem about read-only library?

It makes it slightly harder to remove a Python installation. Depending on the OS, you'll get a failure or require some additional confirmation.

Furthermore, it's very non-standard. Even if that's not a problem by itself, Python should just install things in the standard way.

Also, some tools may want to edit the library after installation. Rebasing on Cygwin is an example of that.

On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 6:25 PM Jeroen Demeyer <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> > Isn't it useful to avoid accidental change while open files with editor for just reading?
>
> Why would that argument apply to a binary file (and only to binary files)?

I didn't notice it's used only for binary libraries.

> > Is there any real world problem about read-only library?
>
> It makes it slightly harder to remove a Python installation. Depending on the OS, you'll get a failure or require some additional confirmation.

Make sense.

> Furthermore, it's very non-standard. Even if that's not a problem by itself, Python should just install things in the standard way.

It's not true if there are some merits and there are no real problem.

New changeset 25648d05ac3d74c436f951579bbb716372fb8cc7 by Ned Deily (jdemeyer) in branch 'master':
bpo-34245: install Python shared library with more standard 0755 mode (GH-8492)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/25648d05ac3d74c436f951579bbb716372fb8cc7

Thanks for the PR. I've merged it for release in 3.8.0.  As I commented on the PR, I don't think we should backport this; the current behavior has been around for many years and was working as designed so it's not really a bug.

resolution: fixed
stage: patch review -> resolved