fix(animations): allow animations on elements in the shadow DOM by jeripeierSBB · Pull Request #40134 · angular/angular

pipeBuitragoFiduciariaBogota

petebacondarwin

@jeripeierSBB jeripeierSBB changed the title fix(animations): allow animations in shadow DOM fix(animations): allow animations on elements in the shadow DOM

Apr 7, 2021

petebacondarwin

AndrewKushnir

When determining whether to run an animation, the `TransitionAnimationPlayer`
checks to see if a DOM element is attached to the document. This is done by
checking to see if the element is "contained" by the document body node.

Previously, if the element was inside a shadow DOM, the engine would
determine that the element was not attached, even if the shadow DOM's
host was attached to the document. This commit updates the `containsElement()`
method on `AnimationDriver` implementations to also include shadow DOM
elements as being contained if their shadow host element is contained.

Further, when using CSS keyframes to trigger animations, the styling
was always added to the `head` element of the document, even for
animations on elements within a shadow DOM. This meant that those
elements never receive those styles and the animation would not run.
This commit updates the insertion of these styles so that they are added,
to the element's "root node", which is the nearest shadow DOM host, or the
`head` of the document if the element is not in a shadow DOM.

Closes angular#25672
When determining whether to run an animation, the `TransitionAnimationPlayer`
checks to see if a DOM element is attached to the document. This is done by
checking to see if the element is "contained" by the document body node.

Previously, if the element was inside a shadow DOM, the engine would
determine that the element was not attached, even if the shadow DOM's
host was attached to the document. This commit updates the `containsElement()`
method on `AnimationDriver` implementations to also include shadow DOM
elements as being contained if their shadow host element is contained.

Further, when using CSS keyframes to trigger animations, the styling
was always added to the `head` element of the document, even for
animations on elements within a shadow DOM. This meant that those
elements never receive those styles and the animation would not run.
This commit updates the insertion of these styles so that they are added,
to the element's "root node", which is the nearest shadow DOM host, or the
`head` of the document if the element is not in a shadow DOM.

Closes angular#25672
When determining whether to run an animation, the `TransitionAnimationPlayer`
checks to see if a DOM element is attached to the document. This is done by
checking to see if the element is "contained" by the document body node.

Previously, if the element was inside a shadow DOM, the engine would
determine that the element was not attached, even if the shadow DOM's
host was attached to the document. This commit updates the `containsElement()`
method on `AnimationDriver` implementations to also include shadow DOM
elements as being contained if their shadow host element is contained.

Further, when using CSS keyframes to trigger animations, the styling
was always added to the `head` element of the document, even for
animations on elements within a shadow DOM. This meant that those
elements never receive those styles and the animation would not run.
This commit updates the insertion of these styles so that they are added,
to the element's "root node", which is the nearest shadow DOM host, or the
`head` of the document if the element is not in a shadow DOM.

Closes angular#25672

@jeripeierSBB

When determining whether to run an animation, the `TransitionAnimationPlayer`
checks to see if a DOM element is attached to the document. This is done by
checking to see if the element is "contained" by the document body node.

Previously, if the element was inside a shadow DOM, the engine would
determine that the element was not attached, even if the shadow DOM's
host was attached to the document. This commit updates the `containsElement()`
method on `AnimationDriver` implementations to also include shadow DOM
elements as being contained if their shadow host element is contained.

Further, when using CSS keyframes to trigger animations, the styling
was always added to the `head` element of the document, even for
animations on elements within a shadow DOM. This meant that those
elements never receive those styles and the animation would not run.
This commit updates the insertion of these styles so that they are added,
to the element's "root node", which is the nearest shadow DOM host, or the
`head` of the document if the element is not in a shadow DOM.

Closes angular#25672

@AndrewKushnir AndrewKushnir removed the action: cleanup

The PR is in need of cleanup, either due to needing a rebase or in response to comments from reviews

label

Apr 13, 2021

AndrewKushnir pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Apr 15, 2021
When determining whether to run an animation, the `TransitionAnimationPlayer`
checks to see if a DOM element is attached to the document. This is done by
checking to see if the element is "contained" by the document body node.

Previously, if the element was inside a shadow DOM, the engine would
determine that the element was not attached, even if the shadow DOM's
host was attached to the document. This commit updates the `containsElement()`
method on `AnimationDriver` implementations to also include shadow DOM
elements as being contained if their shadow host element is contained.

Further, when using CSS keyframes to trigger animations, the styling
was always added to the `head` element of the document, even for
animations on elements within a shadow DOM. This meant that those
elements never receive those styles and the animation would not run.
This commit updates the insertion of these styles so that they are added,
to the element's "root node", which is the nearest shadow DOM host, or the
`head` of the document if the element is not in a shadow DOM.

Closes #25672

PR Close #40134