Add SSVC doc explaining "human-scale bottleneck" idea by ahouseholder · Pull Request #1087 · CERTCC/SSVC
AI review requested due to automatic review settings
March 12, 2026 20:07- Move file from docs/howto/ to docs/topics/ (parallels decision_points_as_bricks.md, addresses Diataxis how-to vs. explanation concern) - Update mkdocs.yml nav: remove from howto, add to topics alongside decision_points_as_bricks.md - Fix intro: add 'designed by humans, for humans' thesis and 'not a process bottleneck' clarification at top of document (threads at lines 68, 107) - Add diagram scope clarification: make explicit that Decision Model = SSVC scope, Data Mapping and Use & Respond are adjacent but outside scope (thread at line 36) - Fix 'layer' jargon: replace 'any layer of the model' with explicit enumeration of outcomes, decision points, decision table, and data mapping (thread at line 97) - Fix Use & Respond contradiction: remove direct feedback link that conflicted with use.md documentation; restate as 'observing real-world results' (line 105) - Add prepare.md hyperlink to Input Automation section (thread at line 113) - Fix all relative links: bootstrap/ -> ../howto/bootstrap/ after file move Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Introduces the standard AI/autonomy term 'human-on-the-loop' in two places to connect it explicitly to the 'human-scale bottleneck' concept: - Introduction: adds one sentence defining the term after establishing that the decision table can be fully automated - Conclusion: replaces the closing sentence with an explicit 'human-on-the-loop' framing that ties accountability to policy governance, not per-decision review Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters