FOUR-12445 Removal of Cypress from Core by josechirivella · Pull Request #5671 · ProcessMaker/processmaker

Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in

Appearance settings

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up

Appearance settings

Conversation

@josechirivella

Copy link

Contributor

We decided to remove Cypress from Core since all the test suites live in another repo and this one wasn't being executed.

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:deploy
ci:next

@processmaker-sonarqube

Copy link

SonarQube Quality Gate

Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@tokensPM

Copy link

QA server was successfully deployed https://ci-4de066f4bc.eng.processmaker.net

@ryancooley ryancooley merged commit f5eff4c into next

Nov 29, 2023

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@ryancooley ryancooley ryancooley approved these changes

@marcoAntonioNina marcoAntonioNina Awaiting requested review from marcoAntonioNina

@nolanpro nolanpro Awaiting requested review from nolanpro

@runyan-co runyan-co Awaiting requested review from runyan-co

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@josechirivella @tokensPM @ryancooley